Database of iris images acquired in the presence of ocular pathologies and assessment of iris recognition reliability for disease-affected eyes

Mateusz Trokielewicz, A. Czajka, P. Maciejewicz
{"title":"Database of iris images acquired in the presence of ocular pathologies and assessment of iris recognition reliability for disease-affected eyes","authors":"Mateusz Trokielewicz, A. Czajka, P. Maciejewicz","doi":"10.1109/CYBConf.2015.7175984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a database of iris images collected from disease affected eyes and an analysis related to the influence of ocular diseases on iris recognition reliability. For that purpose we have collected a database of iris images acquired for 91 different eyes during routine ophthalmology visits. This collection gathers samples for healthy eyes as well as those with various eye pathologies, including cataract, acute glaucoma, posterior and anterior synechiae, retinal detachment, rubeosis iridis, corneal vascularization, corneal grafting, iris damage and atrophy and corneal ulcers, haze or opacities. To our best knowledge this is the first database of such kind that will be made publicly available. In the analysis the data were divided into five groups of samples presenting similar anticipated impact on iris recognition: 1) healthy (no impact), 2) unaffected, clear iris (although the illness was detected), 3) geometrically distorted irides, 4) distorted iris tissue and 5) obstructed iris tissue. Three different iris recognition methods (MIRLIN, VeriEye and OSIRIS) were then used to find differences in average genuine and impostor comparison scores calculated for healthy eyes and those impacted by a disease. Specifically, we obtained significantly worse genuine comparison scores for all iris matchers and all disease-affected eyes when compared to a group of healthy eyes, what have a high potential of impacting false non-match rate.","PeriodicalId":177233,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Cybernetics (CYBCONF)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Cybernetics (CYBCONF)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CYBConf.2015.7175984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

This paper presents a database of iris images collected from disease affected eyes and an analysis related to the influence of ocular diseases on iris recognition reliability. For that purpose we have collected a database of iris images acquired for 91 different eyes during routine ophthalmology visits. This collection gathers samples for healthy eyes as well as those with various eye pathologies, including cataract, acute glaucoma, posterior and anterior synechiae, retinal detachment, rubeosis iridis, corneal vascularization, corneal grafting, iris damage and atrophy and corneal ulcers, haze or opacities. To our best knowledge this is the first database of such kind that will be made publicly available. In the analysis the data were divided into five groups of samples presenting similar anticipated impact on iris recognition: 1) healthy (no impact), 2) unaffected, clear iris (although the illness was detected), 3) geometrically distorted irides, 4) distorted iris tissue and 5) obstructed iris tissue. Three different iris recognition methods (MIRLIN, VeriEye and OSIRIS) were then used to find differences in average genuine and impostor comparison scores calculated for healthy eyes and those impacted by a disease. Specifically, we obtained significantly worse genuine comparison scores for all iris matchers and all disease-affected eyes when compared to a group of healthy eyes, what have a high potential of impacting false non-match rate.
眼部病变的虹膜图像数据库及虹膜识别的可靠性评估
本文建立了虹膜图像数据库,并分析了眼部疾病对虹膜识别可靠性的影响。为此,我们收集了一个数据库,其中包括在常规眼科就诊期间获得的91只不同眼睛的虹膜图像。该收藏收集了健康眼睛的样本,以及患有各种眼病的眼睛的样本,包括白内障、急性青光眼、前后粘连、视网膜脱离、虹膜红斑症、角膜血管化、角膜移植、虹膜损伤和萎缩以及角膜溃疡、薄雾或混浊。据我们所知,这是第一个将公开提供的此类数据库。在分析中,将数据分为五组样本,这些样本对虹膜识别的预期影响相似:1)健康(无影响),2)未受影响,清晰的虹膜(尽管检测到疾病),3)几何扭曲的虹膜,4)扭曲的虹膜组织和5)阻塞的虹膜组织。然后使用三种不同的虹膜识别方法(MIRLIN, VeriEye和OSIRIS)来发现健康眼睛和受疾病影响的眼睛的真实和冒名顶替的平均比较分数的差异。具体来说,与一组健康的眼睛相比,我们获得了所有虹膜匹配者和所有受疾病影响的眼睛的真实比较分数明显更差,这对虚假不匹配率有很大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信