DEENR vs C3R: A Comparative Analysis of Connectivity Restoration Protocols

Mahmood ul Hassan, Shahzad Ali, K. Mahmood, Amin Al Awady, Omar Abdul Rahman Ali Ismil
{"title":"DEENR vs C3R: A Comparative Analysis of Connectivity Restoration Protocols","authors":"Mahmood ul Hassan, Shahzad Ali, K. Mahmood, Amin Al Awady, Omar Abdul Rahman Ali Ismil","doi":"10.1109/ICCIS49240.2020.9257605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to their diverse range of applications, Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) have been the center of attention for research since last few decades. Due to their inherent characteristics, mostly WSNs are deployed in hostile environments where human intervention is mostly infeasible. A sensor node failure is a common phenomenon in WSNs and node failure leads to partitioning of the networks resulting in loss of inter-node connectivity. Loss of connectivity can compromise the operation of the whole sensor network. Therefore, rapid recovery of partitioned network is crucial for persistence of the operation of the sensor network. In the literature, a plethora of different approaches regarding the restoration of inter-node connectivity are present. However, these approaches have not focused on the efficient use of energy, coverage-aware mechanisms, and connectivity restoration in an integrated manner. In this paper we compare two representative approaches for connectivity restoration named C3R (Coverage Conscious Connectivity Restoration) and DEENR (Distributed Energy Efficient Node Relocation Algorithm). Both of these approaches are thoroughly evaluated with respect to multiple performance metrics by using extensive simulations in NS-2. Simulation results conclude that DEENR prove to outperform C3R with respect to multiple performance metrics.","PeriodicalId":425637,"journal":{"name":"2020 2nd International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCIS)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 2nd International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIS49240.2020.9257605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to their diverse range of applications, Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) have been the center of attention for research since last few decades. Due to their inherent characteristics, mostly WSNs are deployed in hostile environments where human intervention is mostly infeasible. A sensor node failure is a common phenomenon in WSNs and node failure leads to partitioning of the networks resulting in loss of inter-node connectivity. Loss of connectivity can compromise the operation of the whole sensor network. Therefore, rapid recovery of partitioned network is crucial for persistence of the operation of the sensor network. In the literature, a plethora of different approaches regarding the restoration of inter-node connectivity are present. However, these approaches have not focused on the efficient use of energy, coverage-aware mechanisms, and connectivity restoration in an integrated manner. In this paper we compare two representative approaches for connectivity restoration named C3R (Coverage Conscious Connectivity Restoration) and DEENR (Distributed Energy Efficient Node Relocation Algorithm). Both of these approaches are thoroughly evaluated with respect to multiple performance metrics by using extensive simulations in NS-2. Simulation results conclude that DEENR prove to outperform C3R with respect to multiple performance metrics.
DEENR与C3R:连接恢复协议的比较分析
由于其广泛的应用范围,无线传感器网络(WSNs)在过去的几十年里一直是研究的焦点。由于其固有的特性,大多数wsn部署在人类干预大多不可实施的敌对环境中。传感器节点故障是wsn中常见的现象,节点故障会导致网络分区,导致节点间连通性丧失。失去连通性会危及整个传感器网络的运行。因此,分区网络的快速恢复对传感器网络的持续运行至关重要。在文献中,关于节点间连通性的恢复存在大量不同的方法。然而,这些方法没有以综合的方式关注能源的有效利用、覆盖感知机制和连通性恢复。在本文中,我们比较了两种具有代表性的连接恢复方法,即C3R(覆盖意识连接恢复)和DEENR(分布式节能节点重新定位算法)。这两种方法都通过在NS-2中使用广泛的模拟来全面评估多个性能指标。仿真结果表明,DEENR在多个性能指标上都优于C3R。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信