Oedipus and Polynices

P. E. Easterling
{"title":"Oedipus and Polynices","authors":"P. E. Easterling","doi":"10.1017/S1750270500030049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is concerned with a problem that has long been one of the most controversial in the Oedipus Coloneus, namely Sophocles' precise intention in juxtaposing Oedipus' terrible cursing of Polynices and his mysterious and solemn passing. I cannot claim to offer a new interpretation of these scenes, but I believe that there is at least a little that is new to be learned from a close study of Sophocles' use of language, an approach which has not often been allowed to play an important part in critical work on the Oedipus Coloneus, despite the very rieh poetic texture of the play. Oedipus is twice importuned by the outside world, first by Creon, who is portrayed as so repellent a hypoerite that we are in no doubt that we are right to sympathize with Oedipus when he contemptuously rejeets him. But Sophocles predisposes us to be much more sympathetic towards the next visitor, Polynices. When Oedipus refuses to see him he is opposed by two characters whom the action of the play so far has led us to admire wholeheartedly, Theseus and Antigone. Theseus (vv. 1179-80) reminds Oedipus that he has a religious duty to grant the suppliant's prayer for an interview widi him, and Antigone at once follows with a long and strongly worded appeal based on the argument that a parent, however cruelly wronged, is not entitled to repay his child with the same ill-treatment (vv. 1181-1203). We a r e t n u s encouraged to look sympathetically at Polynices in his role of repentant son asking his father's forgiveness, but Oedipus does not merely fail to forgive; he sends his son away with appalling","PeriodicalId":177773,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1750270500030049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This paper is concerned with a problem that has long been one of the most controversial in the Oedipus Coloneus, namely Sophocles' precise intention in juxtaposing Oedipus' terrible cursing of Polynices and his mysterious and solemn passing. I cannot claim to offer a new interpretation of these scenes, but I believe that there is at least a little that is new to be learned from a close study of Sophocles' use of language, an approach which has not often been allowed to play an important part in critical work on the Oedipus Coloneus, despite the very rieh poetic texture of the play. Oedipus is twice importuned by the outside world, first by Creon, who is portrayed as so repellent a hypoerite that we are in no doubt that we are right to sympathize with Oedipus when he contemptuously rejeets him. But Sophocles predisposes us to be much more sympathetic towards the next visitor, Polynices. When Oedipus refuses to see him he is opposed by two characters whom the action of the play so far has led us to admire wholeheartedly, Theseus and Antigone. Theseus (vv. 1179-80) reminds Oedipus that he has a religious duty to grant the suppliant's prayer for an interview widi him, and Antigone at once follows with a long and strongly worded appeal based on the argument that a parent, however cruelly wronged, is not entitled to repay his child with the same ill-treatment (vv. 1181-1203). We a r e t n u s encouraged to look sympathetically at Polynices in his role of repentant son asking his father's forgiveness, but Oedipus does not merely fail to forgive; he sends his son away with appalling
俄狄浦斯和波利尼斯
本文关注的是《俄狄浦斯·柯罗涅斯篇》中一个长期以来争议最大的问题,即索福克勒斯将俄狄浦斯对波利尼斯的可怕诅咒与他神秘而庄严的死亡并置的确切意图。我不能声称对这些场景提供一种新的解释,但我相信,至少有一点新的东西可以从索福克勒斯对语言的使用的仔细研究中学到,这种方法通常不被允许在俄狄浦斯·柯罗涅斯的批评工作中发挥重要作用,尽管戏剧非常富有诗意的质感。俄狄浦斯两次被外界纠缠,第一次是克瑞翁,他被描绘成一个令人厌恶的伪君子,当他轻蔑地拒绝俄狄浦斯时,我们毫无疑问地同情他是正确的。但索福克勒斯让我们更容易同情下一位访客波利尼斯。当俄狄浦斯拒绝见他时,他遭到了两个角色的反对,这两个角色是我们迄今为止所由衷钦佩的,他们是忒修斯和安提戈涅。忒修斯(vv。(1179-80)提醒俄狄浦斯,他有宗教义务允许恳求者的祈祷与他会面,安提戈涅立即提出了一个冗长而措辞强烈的呼吁,基于这样的论点,父母,无论多么残酷地受到委屈,都无权以同样的虐待来回报他的孩子(vv.)。1181 - 1203)。我们看到,俄狄浦斯被鼓励同情地看待波利尼斯作为一个忏悔的儿子请求父亲原谅的角色,但俄狄浦斯不仅没有原谅;他把儿子送走了
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信