A formal security analysis of ZigBee (1.0 and 3.0)

Li Li, P. Podder, Md. Endadul Hoque
{"title":"A formal security analysis of ZigBee (1.0 and 3.0)","authors":"Li Li, P. Podder, Md. Endadul Hoque","doi":"10.1145/3384217.3385617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapid increase in the number of IoT devices in recent years indicates how much financial investment and efforts the tech-industries and the device manufacturers have put in. Unfortunately, this aggressive competition can give rise to poor quality IoT devices that are prone to adversarial attacks. To make matter worse, these attacks can compromise not only security but also safety, since an IoT device can directly operate on the physical world. Many recently reported attacks are due to the insecurity present in the underlying communication protocol stacks, and ZigBee is one of them. Considering the emergence and adoption of ZigBee 3.0 and the current market share of ZigBee 1.0, it is essential to study and analyze these protocol stacks at their specification level so that any insecurity at the specification level should be identified and fixed before they go into production. With that goal in mind, in this paper, we develop a model for ZigBee (1.0 and 3.0) and reason about its security properties using a security protocol verification tool (named Tamarin). Our model of ZigBee closely follows the ZigBee specification, and the security properties are derived from the ZigBee specification. We use Tamarin to verify these properties on our model and report our findings on ZigBee 1.0 and ZigBee 3.0.","PeriodicalId":205173,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Hot Topics in the Science of Security","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Hot Topics in the Science of Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3384217.3385617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The rapid increase in the number of IoT devices in recent years indicates how much financial investment and efforts the tech-industries and the device manufacturers have put in. Unfortunately, this aggressive competition can give rise to poor quality IoT devices that are prone to adversarial attacks. To make matter worse, these attacks can compromise not only security but also safety, since an IoT device can directly operate on the physical world. Many recently reported attacks are due to the insecurity present in the underlying communication protocol stacks, and ZigBee is one of them. Considering the emergence and adoption of ZigBee 3.0 and the current market share of ZigBee 1.0, it is essential to study and analyze these protocol stacks at their specification level so that any insecurity at the specification level should be identified and fixed before they go into production. With that goal in mind, in this paper, we develop a model for ZigBee (1.0 and 3.0) and reason about its security properties using a security protocol verification tool (named Tamarin). Our model of ZigBee closely follows the ZigBee specification, and the security properties are derived from the ZigBee specification. We use Tamarin to verify these properties on our model and report our findings on ZigBee 1.0 and ZigBee 3.0.
ZigBee(1.0和3.0)的正式安全性分析
近年来物联网设备数量的快速增长表明,科技行业和设备制造商在这方面投入了大量的资金和努力。不幸的是,这种激烈的竞争可能会导致质量差的物联网设备容易受到对抗性攻击。更糟糕的是,这些攻击不仅会危及安全性,还会危及安全性,因为物联网设备可以直接在物理世界上运行。最近报道的许多攻击都是由于底层通信协议栈中存在的不安全性,而ZigBee就是其中之一。考虑到ZigBee 3.0的出现和采用以及ZigBee 1.0目前的市场份额,有必要在其规范级别上研究和分析这些协议栈,以便在其投入生产之前识别和修复规范级别上的任何不安全因素。考虑到这一目标,在本文中,我们为ZigBee(1.0和3.0)开发了一个模型,并使用安全协议验证工具(名为Tamarin)来解释其安全属性。我们的ZigBee模型严格遵循ZigBee规范,其安全属性源自ZigBee规范。我们使用Tamarin在我们的模型上验证了这些属性,并报告了我们在ZigBee 1.0和ZigBee 3.0上的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信