التناسق بين القوانين الأكثر أمنا للأطراف ( دراسة مقارنة )

وعد حاشوش, عبد الرسول ألأسدي
{"title":"التناسق بين القوانين الأكثر أمنا للأطراف ( دراسة مقارنة )","authors":"وعد حاشوش, عبد الرسول ألأسدي","doi":"10.52113/uj05/022-15/1546-1560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"That the facts on which the national legislator is based in determining the basic purpose of the attribution base that was dealt with in a previous and later era by most of the various legislations .And through general theoretical approaches that require acceptance or functional solution to the assignment role and this may not meet the legitimate expectations of individuals development taking place in different . Societies and the intertwining of international private relations with a foreign element and these legislations that do not meet the interests of individuals in the light of this development .And judge when the work of these rules is that rules of assignment are obligatory to take in to account the law and this not achieved in accordance with the Traditional approach only to .And through the functional role the rules of attribution and from the general principles of the natural function of the rule attribution is that it achieves consistency between and achieves material justice and in turn achieves legal security for the parties in the legal relationship in dispute it is necessary to stand at the purpose for which the rules of attribution were initiated, to search for solutions and to get out of the legislative stalemate to the find of flexibility in line with the development taking place in international private relations .","PeriodicalId":351683,"journal":{"name":"Uruk Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uruk Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52113/uj05/022-15/1546-1560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

That the facts on which the national legislator is based in determining the basic purpose of the attribution base that was dealt with in a previous and later era by most of the various legislations .And through general theoretical approaches that require acceptance or functional solution to the assignment role and this may not meet the legitimate expectations of individuals development taking place in different . Societies and the intertwining of international private relations with a foreign element and these legislations that do not meet the interests of individuals in the light of this development .And judge when the work of these rules is that rules of assignment are obligatory to take in to account the law and this not achieved in accordance with the Traditional approach only to .And through the functional role the rules of attribution and from the general principles of the natural function of the rule attribution is that it achieves consistency between and achieves material justice and in turn achieves legal security for the parties in the legal relationship in dispute it is necessary to stand at the purpose for which the rules of attribution were initiated, to search for solutions and to get out of the legislative stalemate to the find of flexibility in line with the development taking place in international private relations .
缔约方更安全的法律的协调(比较研究)
国家立法者在确定归因基础的基本目的时所依据的事实在过去和后来的时代被大多数不同的立法所处理,并且通过一般的理论方法需要接受或功能性解决分配角色这可能不符合个人发展的合法期望发生在不同的地方。社会和缠绕的国际私人与外国元素的关系,这些立法不能满足个人的利益在这一发展的光时,法官的工作这些规则是规则分配必须考虑到法律,这不仅实现了按照传统方法通过功能,角色属性的规则和一般原则的自然功能规则归因是实现法律关系中当事人之间的一致性和物质公正,从而实现法律保障。因此,必须立足于规则归因产生的目的,寻求解决办法,走出立法僵局,找到符合国际私人关系发展的灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信