Giant Ovarian Mass: About an Uncommon Case Report

Iben Atyya
{"title":"Giant Ovarian Mass: About an Uncommon Case Report","authors":"Iben Atyya","doi":"10.13188/2332-3442.1000045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ovarian giant masses remain today an uncommon clinical presentation thanks to their early incidental radiological discovery. Their symptomatic presentation is usually characterized by abdominopelvic pain and a feeling of heaviness. The most important management is the removal of the tumor in order to allow the anatomopathological study which is the only way to confirm or deny the malignancy. We hereby present an atypical case due to its occurrence in a young 48-year-old female patient, the considerable size of the tumor, its non-specific clinical and radiological presentation making the diagnosis difficult. Case Presentation: This was the case of a 48-year-old woman with no particular antecedents, gravida 5 para 4 with four vaginal deliveries resulting in the birth of four healthy children and one miscarriage. She came to our department for management of a large abdominopelvic mass of more than 30 cm that was bulging out all abdominal organs. She had an MRI that strongly suspected ovarian origin and ROMA score that came back negative for malignancy. A left oophorectomy was followed by abdominal plasty. Anatomopathological study confirmed a serous cystadenoma with no sign of malignancy. The patient was discharged at D4 postoperatively. The follow-up was uneventful. Conclusion: Giant ovarian masses, although uncommon, raise a double difficulty for the clinician. On the one hand, the diagnosis, although largely guided by MRI, can only be confirmed during surgery. On the other hand, it represents a surgical challenge whether by laparotomy or by laparoscopy. In addition, the ROMA score based on the dosage of tumor markers CA125 and HE4 allows malignant tumors to be screened, but confirmation is only provided by anatomopathological study, hence the importance of not rupturing the cyst during","PeriodicalId":329980,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Andrology and Gynaecology","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Andrology and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13188/2332-3442.1000045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ovarian giant masses remain today an uncommon clinical presentation thanks to their early incidental radiological discovery. Their symptomatic presentation is usually characterized by abdominopelvic pain and a feeling of heaviness. The most important management is the removal of the tumor in order to allow the anatomopathological study which is the only way to confirm or deny the malignancy. We hereby present an atypical case due to its occurrence in a young 48-year-old female patient, the considerable size of the tumor, its non-specific clinical and radiological presentation making the diagnosis difficult. Case Presentation: This was the case of a 48-year-old woman with no particular antecedents, gravida 5 para 4 with four vaginal deliveries resulting in the birth of four healthy children and one miscarriage. She came to our department for management of a large abdominopelvic mass of more than 30 cm that was bulging out all abdominal organs. She had an MRI that strongly suspected ovarian origin and ROMA score that came back negative for malignancy. A left oophorectomy was followed by abdominal plasty. Anatomopathological study confirmed a serous cystadenoma with no sign of malignancy. The patient was discharged at D4 postoperatively. The follow-up was uneventful. Conclusion: Giant ovarian masses, although uncommon, raise a double difficulty for the clinician. On the one hand, the diagnosis, although largely guided by MRI, can only be confirmed during surgery. On the other hand, it represents a surgical challenge whether by laparotomy or by laparoscopy. In addition, the ROMA score based on the dosage of tumor markers CA125 and HE4 allows malignant tumors to be screened, but confirmation is only provided by anatomopathological study, hence the importance of not rupturing the cyst during
巨大卵巢肿块:一罕见病例报告
背景:由于早期偶然的放射学发现,卵巢巨大肿块在今天仍然是一种不常见的临床表现。他们的症状表现通常是腹部骨盆疼痛和沉重的感觉。最重要的处理是切除肿瘤,以便进行解剖病理研究,这是确认或否认恶性肿瘤的唯一途径。我们在此报告一个非典型病例,因为它发生在一位年轻的48岁女性患者身上,肿瘤的相当大,其非特异性的临床和放射学表现使得诊断困难。病例介绍:这是一名48岁妇女的病例,无特殊病史,妊娠期5第4段,四次阴道分娩,生下四名健康儿童,一次流产。她来我科治疗一个超过30厘米的大的腹部盆腔肿块,这个肿块已经胀出了所有的腹部器官。她有强烈怀疑卵巢起源的核磁共振和罗马评分返回阴性恶性肿瘤。左卵巢切除术后进行腹部成形术。解剖病理检查证实为浆液性囊腺瘤,无恶性征象。患者于术后4天出院。接下来的事情平淡无奇。结论:卵巢巨大肿物虽不常见,但给临床医师带来双重困难。一方面,诊断,虽然很大程度上由MRI指导,只能在手术中确认。另一方面,无论是剖腹手术还是腹腔镜手术,它都是一个手术挑战。此外,基于肿瘤标志物CA125和HE4剂量的ROMA评分可以筛查恶性肿瘤,但只能通过解剖病理研究来证实,因此在此过程中不使囊肿破裂很重要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信