Financial Institutions and Social Rights: From Foes to Friends?

Matthias Goldmann
{"title":"Financial Institutions and Social Rights: From Foes to Friends?","authors":"Matthias Goldmann","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3513642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper sets out the social rights obligations of both public financial institutions like the World Bank and the IMF, and of private financial institutions like banks. Moving beyond doctrinal analysis, it traces how the World Bank and the IMF have in practice over time considerably improved their compliance with social rights in respect of structural adjustment policies, in particular since the Great Financial Crisis. But social rights still need to become an integral part of their decision-making. By contrast, the private sector has made little progress. Initiatives like the Equator Principles turned out to be underwhelming, and the project of a binding treaty might yield modest results only. Nevertheless, there are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of social rights in relation to financial institutions. Judicial review faces structural constraints and may only filter the most egregious cases. It is therefore necessary to include social risks in the calculation of regulatory capital for private financial institutions. These proposals might prepare financial institutions for the possible transition to a post-growth society.","PeriodicalId":378416,"journal":{"name":"International Economic Law eJournal","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Economic Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3513642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper sets out the social rights obligations of both public financial institutions like the World Bank and the IMF, and of private financial institutions like banks. Moving beyond doctrinal analysis, it traces how the World Bank and the IMF have in practice over time considerably improved their compliance with social rights in respect of structural adjustment policies, in particular since the Great Financial Crisis. But social rights still need to become an integral part of their decision-making. By contrast, the private sector has made little progress. Initiatives like the Equator Principles turned out to be underwhelming, and the project of a binding treaty might yield modest results only. Nevertheless, there are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of social rights in relation to financial institutions. Judicial review faces structural constraints and may only filter the most egregious cases. It is therefore necessary to include social risks in the calculation of regulatory capital for private financial institutions. These proposals might prepare financial institutions for the possible transition to a post-growth society.
金融机构和社会权利:从敌人到朋友?
本文阐述了公共金融机构(如世界银行和国际货币基金组织)和私人金融机构(如银行)的社会权利义务。超越理论分析,它追溯了世界银行和国际货币基金组织在实践中如何随着时间的推移在结构调整政策方面大大改善了对社会权利的遵守,特别是自金融大危机以来。但是,社会权利仍然需要成为他们决策的一个组成部分。相比之下,私营部门几乎没有取得任何进展。像《赤道原则》这样的倡议结果是平淡无奇的,一个具有约束力的条约项目可能只会产生有限的结果。然而,就金融机构而言,社会权利的效力存在固有的限制。司法审查面临结构性限制,可能只会过滤最恶劣的案件。因此,有必要将社会风险纳入民营金融机构监管资本的计算中。这些建议可能会让金融机构为可能过渡到后增长社会做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信