The Impact of Manufacturing Errors on Product Defects

B. Haughey, Relia Train
{"title":"The Impact of Manufacturing Errors on Product Defects","authors":"B. Haughey, Relia Train","doi":"10.1109/RAMS48030.2020.9153663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary & ConclusionsThe Forward of the Aerospace Standard AS13004 Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (PFMEA) and Control Plans defines the industry challenge of designing and producing a safe, dependable, and reliable product in today's global environment. It reads, “To assure customer satisfaction, the aviation, space, and defense industry organizations have to produce and continually improve safe, reliable products that equal or exceed customer and regulatory authority requirements. The globalization of the industry and the resulting diversity of regional/national requirements and expectations have complicated this objective. End-product organizations face the challenge of assuring the quality of and integration of product purchased from suppliers throughout the world and at all levels within the supply chain. Industry suppliers face the challenge of delivering product to multiple customers having varying quality expectations and requirements.” The world is becoming smaller and there are many opportunities for organizations to cross-over into other industries. Most manufacturers have well-defined systems engineering product development processes based on their current industry. However, global customer requirements demand reliability risk analysis, for both product and process designs, in different formats based on different standards. With limited resources and time, organizations must figure out a common process and format that will meet the needs of all customers. The challenge also extends to ensuring suppliers are all meeting the same requirements. There are 6 steps (phases) organizations follow to complete their quality and reliability risk analysis (FMEA or FMECA) of the product and process designs. Organizations will be able to identify a common documentation format that will deliver the required information of any industry standard. Those 6 steps are: 1) Planning; 2) Preparation; 3) Problem Analysis of Product (or Process) Risk; 4) Risk Assessment and Actions; 5) Actions Results, Risk Reassessment (and Control Plans); and 6) Audit, Feedback, and Follow-up Loop. Consistent application of a common process is critical. If an organization falls short in any one area of the process it could affect the overall quality and reliability of their product.FMEA standards have continuously evolved based on changes in industry application and product complexity. Organizations need to evaluate their internal FMEA process to understand if it will support the quality and reliability expectations of both themselves and their customers. Some standards (such as MIL-STD-1629A) have been cancelled for many years and have not had the benefit of updates based on industry knowledge. If your FMEA process does not consider the following process steps there is an increased possibility your product will not meet your internal or customer requirements","PeriodicalId":360096,"journal":{"name":"2020 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS48030.2020.9153663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary & ConclusionsThe Forward of the Aerospace Standard AS13004 Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (PFMEA) and Control Plans defines the industry challenge of designing and producing a safe, dependable, and reliable product in today's global environment. It reads, “To assure customer satisfaction, the aviation, space, and defense industry organizations have to produce and continually improve safe, reliable products that equal or exceed customer and regulatory authority requirements. The globalization of the industry and the resulting diversity of regional/national requirements and expectations have complicated this objective. End-product organizations face the challenge of assuring the quality of and integration of product purchased from suppliers throughout the world and at all levels within the supply chain. Industry suppliers face the challenge of delivering product to multiple customers having varying quality expectations and requirements.” The world is becoming smaller and there are many opportunities for organizations to cross-over into other industries. Most manufacturers have well-defined systems engineering product development processes based on their current industry. However, global customer requirements demand reliability risk analysis, for both product and process designs, in different formats based on different standards. With limited resources and time, organizations must figure out a common process and format that will meet the needs of all customers. The challenge also extends to ensuring suppliers are all meeting the same requirements. There are 6 steps (phases) organizations follow to complete their quality and reliability risk analysis (FMEA or FMECA) of the product and process designs. Organizations will be able to identify a common documentation format that will deliver the required information of any industry standard. Those 6 steps are: 1) Planning; 2) Preparation; 3) Problem Analysis of Product (or Process) Risk; 4) Risk Assessment and Actions; 5) Actions Results, Risk Reassessment (and Control Plans); and 6) Audit, Feedback, and Follow-up Loop. Consistent application of a common process is critical. If an organization falls short in any one area of the process it could affect the overall quality and reliability of their product.FMEA standards have continuously evolved based on changes in industry application and product complexity. Organizations need to evaluate their internal FMEA process to understand if it will support the quality and reliability expectations of both themselves and their customers. Some standards (such as MIL-STD-1629A) have been cancelled for many years and have not had the benefit of updates based on industry knowledge. If your FMEA process does not consider the following process steps there is an increased possibility your product will not meet your internal or customer requirements
制造错误对产品缺陷的影响
航空航天标准AS13004过程失效模式和影响分析(PFMEA)和控制计划的提出定义了在当今全球环境下设计和生产安全,可靠和可靠产品的行业挑战。它写道:“为了确保客户满意,航空、航天和国防工业组织必须生产并不断改进安全、可靠的产品,达到或超过客户和监管机构的要求。”该行业的全球化以及由此产生的区域/国家需求和期望的多样性使这一目标复杂化。最终产品组织面临的挑战是确保从世界各地的供应商和供应链中的所有级别购买的产品的质量和集成。行业供应商面临着向拥有不同质量期望和要求的多个客户交付产品的挑战。”世界变得越来越小,组织有很多机会跨入其他行业。大多数制造商基于他们当前的行业都有定义良好的系统工程产品开发过程。然而,全球客户要求对产品和工艺设计进行基于不同标准的不同格式的可靠性风险分析。在有限的资源和时间下,组织必须找出一个能够满足所有客户需求的通用流程和格式。挑战还延伸到确保供应商都满足相同的要求。组织需要遵循6个步骤(阶段)来完成产品和工艺设计的质量和可靠性风险分析(FMEA或FMECA)。组织将能够确定一种通用的文档格式,该格式将提供任何行业标准所需的信息。这6个步骤是:1)计划;2)准备;3)产品(或过程)风险问题分析;4)风险评估与措施;5)措施结果、风险再评估(及控制计划);6)审核、反馈和跟踪循环。一致地应用公共流程是至关重要的。如果一个组织在过程的任何一个方面存在不足,它可能会影响其产品的整体质量和可靠性。FMEA标准随着行业应用和产品复杂性的变化而不断发展。组织需要评估他们的内部FMEA过程,以了解它是否支持他们自己和客户的质量和可靠性期望。一些标准(如MIL-STD-1629A)已经被取消多年,并且没有得到基于行业知识的更新的好处。如果你们的FMEA流程没有考虑以下流程步骤,那么你们的产品不符合内部或客户要求的可能性就会增加
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信