TOPSIS VE AHP ÇOK KRİTERLİ KARAR VERME YÖNTEMLERİNİN PERSONEL SEÇİM SÜRECİNE UYGULANMASI

Mehmet Ada, Hüseyin Çakır
{"title":"TOPSIS VE AHP ÇOK KRİTERLİ KARAR VERME YÖNTEMLERİNİN PERSONEL SEÇİM SÜRECİNE UYGULANMASI","authors":"Mehmet Ada, Hüseyin Çakır","doi":"10.46519/ij3dptdi.1018279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decision making and problem solving process constitute the basis of management activity in businesses. From primitive times until today, individuals have faced the problem of decision making in various situations. Decision making is the job of choosing between alternatives. In traditional decisions, data related to the decision process are collected and analyzed, and results are evaluated. However, decisions about situations or problems that people encounter in their daily lives often have more than one and often conflicting criteria. Considering this situation, using heuristic methods to reach a decision is insufficient. Versatile decision-making problems come across businesses and / or organizations in all areas of life. Decision makers mostly make decisions when there are more than one factor and criteria with different scalability. Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) can be defined as the decision-making process by using at least two criteria within a set of countably finite or uncountable choices. Especially, it will be convenient for managers at strategic level to operate Multi-Criteria Decision Making processes in order to make the most appropriate decision in complex decision problems. Multi-criteria decision making techniques consist of methods aiming to reach the “best fit” solution by using multiple criteria with different scalability. In this study, a Decision Support System that meets the decision-making needs of the manager by operating two different MCDM processes together is proposed. In this context, AHP (Analytic Hierarcy Process) and TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) MCDM methods were used together. AHP method was used to determine the weights of selection criteria, and TOPSIS method was used to rank the candidates in the light of determined criteria. Both MCDM methods mentioned are described as \"single criteria synthesis approach excluding incommensurability\".","PeriodicalId":358444,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46519/ij3dptdi.1018279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Decision making and problem solving process constitute the basis of management activity in businesses. From primitive times until today, individuals have faced the problem of decision making in various situations. Decision making is the job of choosing between alternatives. In traditional decisions, data related to the decision process are collected and analyzed, and results are evaluated. However, decisions about situations or problems that people encounter in their daily lives often have more than one and often conflicting criteria. Considering this situation, using heuristic methods to reach a decision is insufficient. Versatile decision-making problems come across businesses and / or organizations in all areas of life. Decision makers mostly make decisions when there are more than one factor and criteria with different scalability. Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) can be defined as the decision-making process by using at least two criteria within a set of countably finite or uncountable choices. Especially, it will be convenient for managers at strategic level to operate Multi-Criteria Decision Making processes in order to make the most appropriate decision in complex decision problems. Multi-criteria decision making techniques consist of methods aiming to reach the “best fit” solution by using multiple criteria with different scalability. In this study, a Decision Support System that meets the decision-making needs of the manager by operating two different MCDM processes together is proposed. In this context, AHP (Analytic Hierarcy Process) and TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) MCDM methods were used together. AHP method was used to determine the weights of selection criteria, and TOPSIS method was used to rank the candidates in the light of determined criteria. Both MCDM methods mentioned are described as "single criteria synthesis approach excluding incommensurability".
决策和解决问题的过程构成了企业管理活动的基础。从原始时代到今天,个人在各种情况下都面临着决策问题。决策是在各种选择中做出选择的工作。在传统的决策中,收集和分析与决策过程相关的数据,并对结果进行评估。然而,人们在日常生活中遇到的情况或问题的决定往往不止一个,而且往往是相互冲突的标准。考虑到这种情况,使用启发式方法来达成决策是不够的。企业和/或组织在生活的各个领域都会遇到各种各样的决策问题。决策者通常在存在多个具有不同可伸缩性的因素和标准时做出决策。多准则决策(Multiple Criteria Decision Making, MCDM)可以定义为在一组可数有限或不可数的选择中使用至少两个标准的决策过程。特别是在复杂的决策问题中,便于管理者在战略层面上运用多准则决策过程,做出最合适的决策。多准则决策技术是指通过使用具有不同可扩展性的多个准则来达到“最适合”解决方案的方法。在本研究中,提出了一个决策支持系统,通过两个不同的MCDM过程一起操作来满足管理者的决策需求。在此背景下,AHP(层次分析法)和TOPSIS(理想解相似性排序偏好技术)MCDM方法被结合使用。采用层次分析法确定选择标准的权重,并根据确定的标准采用TOPSIS法对候选企业进行排序。上述两种MCDM方法都被描述为“排除不可通约性的单一标准综合方法”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信