‘Consumer power’ on the power market: the new paradigm on electric power

Sir Per Ribbing
{"title":"‘Consumer power’ on the power market: the new paradigm on electric power","authors":"Sir Per Ribbing","doi":"10.4337/relp.2022.01.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIn the old, physical, way of regarding the Product Electricity as being similar to water flowing in pipes, the statement ‘All electricity mixes on the grid’ held true. The picture of a bathtub into which electricity was supplied (flowed) from different sources: Hydro, Nuclear, Fossil, and Wind & Solar was the norm, the ‘truth’. However, from a market and consumer power point of view, and from an economic point of view, this analogy with a bathtub actually reveals a misunderstanding of what the Product Electricity really is and how power is transferred from producer to consumer.\nElectricity which is audited does not mix with any other electricity. Only electricity which is not audited does mix. The anonymous agents who are the carriers of the purchased Product Electricity, i.e. the kWh:s, they are mixed. The product itself (the Product Electricity) is not mixed, if audited. The old bathtub analogy is false. It is an old misunderstanding of how electric power is traded and transferred.\nNB: It is electric power that is produced and consumed. Energy cannot be produced, nor consumed. The first law of thermodynamics states this as a fundamental law of nature.\nThe new paradigm on electric power explains how the Product Electricity is transferred from power generator to power consumer. The transfer is made by help of anonymous and interchangeable agents: kWh:s.\nThis is the correct way of understanding the new situation with deregulated power markets offering different ‘colours’ of power, i.e. electricity with different environmental loads, e.g. ‘Green Power’. The new paradigm uses an analogy with the banking system, ‘The Bank Grid’, where the parallel between bank grid and electric grid is, in fact, exact. In this new market situation the new paradigm on electric power shows that there exists a possible choice of not consuming any coal power.\nThe 10 hottest years ever measured globally have all occurred since 2010, with the top ten being 2016, 2020, 2019, 2015, 2017, 2021, 2018, 2014, 2010, 2013, respectively. The Climate Crisis is here. The New Paradigm on Electric Power shows us how we can choose to not consume any power produced by fossil energy.","PeriodicalId":438737,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Energy Law and Policy Review","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Energy Law and Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/relp.2022.01.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the old, physical, way of regarding the Product Electricity as being similar to water flowing in pipes, the statement ‘All electricity mixes on the grid’ held true. The picture of a bathtub into which electricity was supplied (flowed) from different sources: Hydro, Nuclear, Fossil, and Wind & Solar was the norm, the ‘truth’. However, from a market and consumer power point of view, and from an economic point of view, this analogy with a bathtub actually reveals a misunderstanding of what the Product Electricity really is and how power is transferred from producer to consumer. Electricity which is audited does not mix with any other electricity. Only electricity which is not audited does mix. The anonymous agents who are the carriers of the purchased Product Electricity, i.e. the kWh:s, they are mixed. The product itself (the Product Electricity) is not mixed, if audited. The old bathtub analogy is false. It is an old misunderstanding of how electric power is traded and transferred. NB: It is electric power that is produced and consumed. Energy cannot be produced, nor consumed. The first law of thermodynamics states this as a fundamental law of nature. The new paradigm on electric power explains how the Product Electricity is transferred from power generator to power consumer. The transfer is made by help of anonymous and interchangeable agents: kWh:s. This is the correct way of understanding the new situation with deregulated power markets offering different ‘colours’ of power, i.e. electricity with different environmental loads, e.g. ‘Green Power’. The new paradigm uses an analogy with the banking system, ‘The Bank Grid’, where the parallel between bank grid and electric grid is, in fact, exact. In this new market situation the new paradigm on electric power shows that there exists a possible choice of not consuming any coal power. The 10 hottest years ever measured globally have all occurred since 2010, with the top ten being 2016, 2020, 2019, 2015, 2017, 2021, 2018, 2014, 2010, 2013, respectively. The Climate Crisis is here. The New Paradigm on Electric Power shows us how we can choose to not consume any power produced by fossil energy.
电力市场上的“消费者电力”:电力的新范式
以旧的、物理的方式来看待产品电力,就像在管道中流动的水一样,“所有的电都在电网中混合”这句话是正确的。浴缸里的电力来自不同的来源:水电、核能、化石能源、风能和太阳能,这是常态,是“真相”。然而,从市场和消费者力量的角度来看,从经济的角度来看,这个与浴缸的类比实际上揭示了对产品电力的真正含义以及电力如何从生产者转移到消费者的误解。被审计的电力不与任何其他电力混合。只有未经审计的电力才混合在一起。作为购买的产品电力(即kWh:s)的载体的匿名代理,它们是混合的。产品本身(产品电)不混合,如果审计。旧的浴缸类比是错误的。这是一个关于电力如何交易和转移的古老误解。它是生产和消耗的电力。能源不能生产,也不能消耗。热力学第一定律指出这是自然的基本定律。电力的新范式解释了产品电力如何从发电机转移到电力消费者。传输是通过匿名和可互换的代理进行的:kWh:s。这是理解新形势的正确方式,即解除管制的电力市场提供不同“颜色”的电力,即不同环境负荷的电力,例如“绿色电力”。新的范例使用了与银行系统的类比,“银行网格”,其中银行网格和电网之间的平行关系实际上是精确的。在这种新的市场形势下,新的电力模式表明存在不使用任何煤电的可能选择。全球有史以来最热的10年都发生在2010年之后,前10年分别是2016年、2020年、2019年、2015年、2017年、2021年、2018年、2014年、2010年和2013年。气候危机来了。《电力新范式》向我们展示了如何选择不消耗任何由化石能源产生的电力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信