The Blasphemy of Europe/The Europe of Blasphemy

Marc-William Debono
{"title":"The Blasphemy of Europe/The Europe of Blasphemy","authors":"Marc-William Debono","doi":"10.18778/8142-286-4.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"n this paper, I consider the utterance of Friedrich Nietzsche’s madman that “God is dead”1 as the “first” European blasphemy which transgresses the sacred in an attempt to recapture a meaning of life without any reference to God. The madman, after announcing the death of God, asks the following questions: “What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent? Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it?”2 The questioning by the madman points to an apprehension that mortals can utilise the power taken from God to invent new games of power. This paper focuses on what I see as a deification of the human, and I politicize its blasphemous character. Though today’s politics appears to be grounded in the “temporal world, the temporal aspect of reality”3 of our secular age, the metaphor of God is still at work. For secularism implies an “understanding in which our moral, spiritual or religious experience and search takes place,”4 one which still seeks to express the secular in terms of “what was once theologically thought as realization, fulfilment and plenitude.”5","PeriodicalId":227308,"journal":{"name":"What’s New in the New Europe? Redefining Culture, Politics, Identity","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"What’s New in the New Europe? Redefining Culture, Politics, Identity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/8142-286-4.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

n this paper, I consider the utterance of Friedrich Nietzsche’s madman that “God is dead”1 as the “first” European blasphemy which transgresses the sacred in an attempt to recapture a meaning of life without any reference to God. The madman, after announcing the death of God, asks the following questions: “What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent? Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it?”2 The questioning by the madman points to an apprehension that mortals can utilise the power taken from God to invent new games of power. This paper focuses on what I see as a deification of the human, and I politicize its blasphemous character. Though today’s politics appears to be grounded in the “temporal world, the temporal aspect of reality”3 of our secular age, the metaphor of God is still at work. For secularism implies an “understanding in which our moral, spiritual or religious experience and search takes place,”4 one which still seeks to express the secular in terms of “what was once theologically thought as realization, fulfilment and plenitude.”5
欧洲的亵渎/亵渎的欧洲
在本文中,我认为弗里德里希·尼采的疯子所说的“上帝死了”是“第一次”欧洲的亵渎,它违背了神圣,试图在不涉及上帝的情况下重新获得生命的意义。疯子在宣布了上帝的死亡之后,问了以下问题:“我们应该发明什么样的赎罪节,什么样的神圣游戏?”这事的伟大不是我们无法承受吗?难道我们自己不应该成为神,只是为了显得配得上它吗?疯子的提问表明了一种恐惧,即凡人可以利用从上帝那里获得的力量来发明新的权力游戏。这篇文章关注的是我所看到的人类的神化,我把它的亵渎性政治化了。虽然今天的政治似乎是建立在我们这个世俗时代的“世俗世界,现实的世俗方面”的基础上,但上帝的隐喻仍然在起作用。因为世俗主义意味着一种“我们的道德、精神或宗教经验和探索发生的理解”,这种理解仍然试图用“曾经在神学上被认为是实现、实现和充实的东西”来表达世俗
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信