MENGAPA INOVASI DIBUTUHKAN DALAM PENENTUAN PRIORITAS KEBIJAKAN ANGGARAN DESA

Shadu Satwika Wijaya
{"title":"MENGAPA INOVASI DIBUTUHKAN DALAM PENENTUAN PRIORITAS KEBIJAKAN ANGGARAN DESA","authors":"Shadu Satwika Wijaya","doi":"10.56655/jid.v1i2.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A village's budgeting process is crucial to the village's overall financial cycle. Research on public budgeting is urgently needed because democratization necessitates transparency regarding the utilization of village transfer funds. According to the findings of previous research, the village government's budgeting performance has been quite optimal in terms of the planning, implementation, and budget utilization processes. There are still conditions that are not yet aligned between priorities and budget allocations to preferences for basic service needs for the community. However, the good performance of this budgeting has not been matched by efforts to prioritize the basic service needs of rural communities. This study analyzes the data using the theory of actor relations in public policy as a result .The research was done using a qualitative method, and the locations of the study were 24 randomly selected villages in the Cilacap Regency. Stakeholders in the development of village-level budgeting policies are the focus of this study. Focus Group Discussion (FGD) was used to gather data. According to the findings of this study, there is a disconnect between the activities program included in the Village Government Budget (APBDes) and the requirements of the village community. At the village government elite level, there was little discussion following the aspirations screening.","PeriodicalId":311351,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Inovasi Daerah","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Inovasi Daerah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56655/jid.v1i2.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A village's budgeting process is crucial to the village's overall financial cycle. Research on public budgeting is urgently needed because democratization necessitates transparency regarding the utilization of village transfer funds. According to the findings of previous research, the village government's budgeting performance has been quite optimal in terms of the planning, implementation, and budget utilization processes. There are still conditions that are not yet aligned between priorities and budget allocations to preferences for basic service needs for the community. However, the good performance of this budgeting has not been matched by efforts to prioritize the basic service needs of rural communities. This study analyzes the data using the theory of actor relations in public policy as a result .The research was done using a qualitative method, and the locations of the study were 24 randomly selected villages in the Cilacap Regency. Stakeholders in the development of village-level budgeting policies are the focus of this study. Focus Group Discussion (FGD) was used to gather data. According to the findings of this study, there is a disconnect between the activities program included in the Village Government Budget (APBDes) and the requirements of the village community. At the village government elite level, there was little discussion following the aspirations screening.
为什么在确定农村预算政策的优先事项时需要创新
一个村庄的预算编制过程对整个村庄的财务周期至关重要。由于民主化要求村级转移支付资金的使用透明化,因此迫切需要对公共预算进行研究。从以往的研究结果来看,村政府的预算绩效在规划、执行和预算使用过程中都是最优的。在优先事项和预算拨款与优先满足社区基本服务需求之间,仍有一些条件尚未达成一致。然而,这种预算编制的良好表现并没有与优先考虑农村社区基本服务需求的努力相匹配。本研究运用公共政策行为者关系理论对数据进行分析,研究采用定性方法,研究地点为奇拉卡普县随机选取的24个村庄。村级预算政策制定中的利益相关者是本研究的重点。采用焦点小组讨论(FGD)收集数据。根据本研究的结果,村政府预算(APBDes)中包含的活动计划与村社区的需求之间存在脱节。在村政府精英层面,在愿望筛选之后几乎没有讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信