The State of Europe

Andrew Duff
{"title":"The State of Europe","authors":"Andrew Duff","doi":"10.4324/9781003202219-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"• The majority of respondents believe that the EU is in worse shape than in 1995. • Respondents from the EU are more inclined than their Southern Mediterranean counterparts to assess that the situation of the EU has deteriorated since 1995. • Internal phenomena (and in particular populism and nationalism) rather than external phenomena threaten the European integration process. • Inner divisions on key issues and re-bilateralisation of relations are the most significant factors affecting the credibility of the EU in the Mediterranean. Respondents from Southern Mediterranean countries are more prone than European respondents to identify the EU’s weak role in conflict zones as a factor affecting the EU’s credibility. • Overall, the EU is not seen as contributing to the instability of the SEM region in comparison with other countries. The USA is identified as the most disruptive foreign player. • However, some dynamics within the EU or some of its actions can have negative effects on the stability of its southern neighbourhood, in particular “Securitisation of migration policies”. For SEM respondents “Military interventions from some EU member states” are the main destabilising factor while for EU respondents “Securitisation of migration policies” comes first.","PeriodicalId":113680,"journal":{"name":"Britain and the Puzzle of European Union","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Britain and the Puzzle of European Union","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003202219-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

• The majority of respondents believe that the EU is in worse shape than in 1995. • Respondents from the EU are more inclined than their Southern Mediterranean counterparts to assess that the situation of the EU has deteriorated since 1995. • Internal phenomena (and in particular populism and nationalism) rather than external phenomena threaten the European integration process. • Inner divisions on key issues and re-bilateralisation of relations are the most significant factors affecting the credibility of the EU in the Mediterranean. Respondents from Southern Mediterranean countries are more prone than European respondents to identify the EU’s weak role in conflict zones as a factor affecting the EU’s credibility. • Overall, the EU is not seen as contributing to the instability of the SEM region in comparison with other countries. The USA is identified as the most disruptive foreign player. • However, some dynamics within the EU or some of its actions can have negative effects on the stability of its southern neighbourhood, in particular “Securitisation of migration policies”. For SEM respondents “Military interventions from some EU member states” are the main destabilising factor while for EU respondents “Securitisation of migration policies” comes first.
欧洲现状
•大多数受访者认为,欧盟的状况比1995年更糟。•来自欧盟的受访者比南地中海地区的受访者更倾向于评估欧盟的形势自1995年以来已经恶化。•威胁欧洲一体化进程的不是外部现象,而是内部现象(尤其是民粹主义和民族主义)。•在关键问题上的内部分歧和关系的重新双边化是影响欧盟在地中海地区可信度的最重要因素。来自南地中海国家的受访者比欧洲受访者更倾向于将欧盟在冲突地区的弱势角色视为影响欧盟可信度的一个因素。•总体而言,与其他国家相比,欧盟并未被视为造成SEM地区不稳定的因素。美国被认为是最具破坏性的外国玩家。•然而,欧盟内部的一些动态或其一些行动可能对其南部邻国的稳定产生负面影响,特别是“移民政策的证券化”。对于SEM受访者来说,“一些欧盟成员国的军事干预”是主要的不稳定因素,而对于欧盟受访者来说,“移民政策的证券化”排在第一位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信