The Contemporary Art of the Nature Morte in the Age of Artificial Life Forms: The Metafictional Illusion of Life in Installation Art and Jeanette Winterson’s Frankissstein

Audrey Chan
{"title":"The Contemporary Art of the Nature Morte in the Age of Artificial Life Forms: The Metafictional Illusion of Life in Installation Art and Jeanette Winterson’s Frankissstein","authors":"Audrey Chan","doi":"10.2218/forum.32.6469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Observing the artistic response to the illusional nature of artificial life forms in the field of installation art, contemporary writers often allude to conceptual artworks through ekphrastic means to “grasp the texture of the contemporary real” (Virilio 4) in a technologically “transformative moment” (Boxall 4). A “reality hunger” for the contemporary brings together a “burgeoning group of interrelated […] artists in a multitude of forms of media” (Shields 3) to experiment new forms across disciplines through ekphrasis, which “strikes to explode” the “stuffed package” of a culture “containable with its shaped word” (Krieger 233). In her essay “Art Objects” (1995), Jeanette Winterson shows her interest in contemporary conceptual art as she writes that “the true artist is interested in the art object as an art process” and establishing a connection to the future instead of being interested in the final product (12). Her definition of art coincides with that of conceptual art as it seeks to analyse “the ideas underlying the creation and reception of art” (Shanken 433), and thus takes on the framework of the meta-critical process from conceptual art with “the use of scientific concepts and technological media both to question their prescribed applications and to create new aesthetic models” (Shanken 434). Deriving from the artistic landscape of conceptual installation art and its interactions with science, Winterson borrows the subject of the nature morte and the metafictional framework to address the clashes between artificial life forms and the human civilisation by alluding to artworks such as those of Damien Hirst in her novel Frankissstein (2019) when writing about cryonic bodies: “It’s a little like an art installation in here isn’t it? Have you seen Damien Hirst’s pickled shark in a tank?” (106). Based on the interdisciplinary interrelations between installation art and contemporary literature, this paper will read the dialogue between Winterson’s ekphrastic subject of the nature morte in Frankissstein and contemporary installation art, including works of Hirst, Cai Guo-Qiang, and Guillaume Paris, as a response to the rise of artificial life forms with respect to their metafictional and illusional nature as AI will become “fully self-designing” (Winterson 73).","PeriodicalId":439591,"journal":{"name":"FORUM: University of Edinburgh Postgraduate Journal of Culture & the Arts","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FORUM: University of Edinburgh Postgraduate Journal of Culture & the Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2218/forum.32.6469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Observing the artistic response to the illusional nature of artificial life forms in the field of installation art, contemporary writers often allude to conceptual artworks through ekphrastic means to “grasp the texture of the contemporary real” (Virilio 4) in a technologically “transformative moment” (Boxall 4). A “reality hunger” for the contemporary brings together a “burgeoning group of interrelated […] artists in a multitude of forms of media” (Shields 3) to experiment new forms across disciplines through ekphrasis, which “strikes to explode” the “stuffed package” of a culture “containable with its shaped word” (Krieger 233). In her essay “Art Objects” (1995), Jeanette Winterson shows her interest in contemporary conceptual art as she writes that “the true artist is interested in the art object as an art process” and establishing a connection to the future instead of being interested in the final product (12). Her definition of art coincides with that of conceptual art as it seeks to analyse “the ideas underlying the creation and reception of art” (Shanken 433), and thus takes on the framework of the meta-critical process from conceptual art with “the use of scientific concepts and technological media both to question their prescribed applications and to create new aesthetic models” (Shanken 434). Deriving from the artistic landscape of conceptual installation art and its interactions with science, Winterson borrows the subject of the nature morte and the metafictional framework to address the clashes between artificial life forms and the human civilisation by alluding to artworks such as those of Damien Hirst in her novel Frankissstein (2019) when writing about cryonic bodies: “It’s a little like an art installation in here isn’t it? Have you seen Damien Hirst’s pickled shark in a tank?” (106). Based on the interdisciplinary interrelations between installation art and contemporary literature, this paper will read the dialogue between Winterson’s ekphrastic subject of the nature morte in Frankissstein and contemporary installation art, including works of Hirst, Cai Guo-Qiang, and Guillaume Paris, as a response to the rise of artificial life forms with respect to their metafictional and illusional nature as AI will become “fully self-designing” (Winterson 73).
人工生命形式时代的当代自然艺术:装置艺术中的元虚构生命幻觉与珍妮特·温特森的《弗兰肯斯坦》
观察装置艺术领域对人工生命形态的虚幻性的艺术反应;当代作家经常通过措辞来暗示概念艺术,以在技术上的“变革时刻”(Boxall 4)中“把握当代真实的纹理”(Virilio 4)。对当代艺术的“现实饥饿”将“新兴的相互关联的[…]艺术家群体聚集在多种媒体形式中”(Shields 3),通过措辞来尝试跨学科的新形式。它“打击爆炸”了一种文化的“塞满了东西的包装”,这种文化“被它的形字所容纳”(克里格233)。Jeanette Winterson在她的文章“艺术对象”(1995)中显示了她对当代观念艺术的兴趣,她写道:“真正的艺术家对作为艺术过程的艺术对象感兴趣”,并建立与未来的联系,而不是对最终产品感兴趣(12)。她对艺术的定义与观念艺术的定义一致,因为它试图分析“艺术创作和接受背后的想法”(Shanken 433),因此采用了观念艺术的元批判过程框架,“使用科学概念和技术媒体来质疑它们的规定应用并创造新的美学模式”(Shanken 434)。从概念装置艺术的艺术景观及其与科学的相互作用中,温特森借用了自然死亡的主题和元虚构框架,通过暗指达米安·赫斯特(Damien Hirst)在她的小说《弗兰西斯斯坦》(Frankissstein, 2019)中的艺术作品,来解决人工生命形式与人类文明之间的冲突:“这里有点像艺术装置,不是吗?你见过达米恩·赫斯特在水箱里的腌鲨鱼吗?”(106)。基于装置艺术与当代文学之间跨学科的相互关系,本文将阅读温特森在《Frankissstein》中自然死亡的艺术主题与当代装置艺术之间的对话,包括赫斯特、蔡国强和纪奥姆·帕里斯的作品,作为对人工生命形式兴起的回应,就其元虚构和虚幻的性质而言,人工智能将成为“完全自我设计”(温特森73)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信