Social impacts of ethical artifical intelligence and autonomous system design

N. Hutchins, Zack Kirkendoll, L. Hook
{"title":"Social impacts of ethical artifical intelligence and autonomous system design","authors":"N. Hutchins, Zack Kirkendoll, L. Hook","doi":"10.1109/SYSENG.2017.8088298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the introduction of autonomous systems becoming more and more prevalent in modern society a major focus of research on Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Autonomous Systems (AS) ethics is becoming important. There are many questions in the public about how these AI/AS programs will make ethical decisions as well as what ethical issues will be dealt with at a developmental level. Darning AI/AS development, these choices are mainly developed by personal choice of the developers which is an objective view of any issue on how to handle difficult situations. In most conversation about AI/AS control, people have an issue with how ethical decisions are made or which decision is made prompting them to want human intervention during these situations. The IEEE Standards Association (SA) has been developing a set of basic guidelines to help alleviate some of the ambiguity of these sensitive issues. This paper is a literature review of AI/AS design guidelines and a case study of different incidence that AI/AS systems could be involved in producing many of the social and ethical quandaries brought on by AI/AS system development.","PeriodicalId":354846,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE International Systems Engineering Symposium (ISSE)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE International Systems Engineering Symposium (ISSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSENG.2017.8088298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

With the introduction of autonomous systems becoming more and more prevalent in modern society a major focus of research on Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Autonomous Systems (AS) ethics is becoming important. There are many questions in the public about how these AI/AS programs will make ethical decisions as well as what ethical issues will be dealt with at a developmental level. Darning AI/AS development, these choices are mainly developed by personal choice of the developers which is an objective view of any issue on how to handle difficult situations. In most conversation about AI/AS control, people have an issue with how ethical decisions are made or which decision is made prompting them to want human intervention during these situations. The IEEE Standards Association (SA) has been developing a set of basic guidelines to help alleviate some of the ambiguity of these sensitive issues. This paper is a literature review of AI/AS design guidelines and a case study of different incidence that AI/AS systems could be involved in producing many of the social and ethical quandaries brought on by AI/AS system development.
伦理人工智能的社会影响与自主系统设计
随着自治系统的引入在现代社会越来越普遍,人工智能(AI)和自治系统(AS)伦理的研究成为一个重要的焦点。关于这些AI/AS程序将如何做出伦理决策,以及在发展阶段将处理哪些伦理问题,公众有很多问题。在AI/AS开发中,这些选择主要是由开发人员的个人选择开发的,这是对如何处理困难情况的任何问题的客观看法。在大多数关于AI/AS控制的对话中,人们都有关于如何做出道德决定或做出哪些决定的问题,这些决定促使他们希望在这些情况下进行人工干预。IEEE标准协会(SA)一直在开发一套基本指导方针,以帮助减轻这些敏感问题的一些模糊性。本文对AI/AS设计指南进行了文献综述,并对AI/AS系统可能产生的许多由AI/AS系统开发带来的社会和伦理困境的不同事件进行了案例研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信