Meaningful, effective and sustainable? Challenges for children and young people’s participation

E. Kay, M. Tisdall
{"title":"Meaningful, effective and sustainable? Challenges for children and young people’s participation","authors":"E. Kay, M. Tisdall","doi":"10.1332/policypress/9781447345411.003.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Children and young people’s participation activities continue to grow, galvanised by the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. As the activities have proliferated, so has a list of common barriers and problems for children and young people’s participation in collective decision-making: from tokenism and lack of impact on decision-making, to some children and young people being over-consulted while others are marginalised. While this list is frustratingly familiar, certain activities seem to address all or most of these barriers and problems. These examples provide potential learning tools, to examine why they have apparently done so. One such example is youth-led research projects, which involve a core group of children and young people, over a set amount of time, with facilitating adults and organisations. This chapter considers how the young researchers and projects claim credibility and legitimacy, through processes of knowledge production. By emphasising expertise, these projects resist perennial critiques of children and young people’s participation being unrepresentative. But they create inequalities for those with less time, interest or commitment for in-depth involvement. The chapter concludes that such projects are not radical in challenging the norms of legitimacy and credibility but can be in positioning children and young people as knowledge producers.","PeriodicalId":373946,"journal":{"name":"Young People's Participation","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Young People's Participation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447345411.003.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Children and young people’s participation activities continue to grow, galvanised by the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. As the activities have proliferated, so has a list of common barriers and problems for children and young people’s participation in collective decision-making: from tokenism and lack of impact on decision-making, to some children and young people being over-consulted while others are marginalised. While this list is frustratingly familiar, certain activities seem to address all or most of these barriers and problems. These examples provide potential learning tools, to examine why they have apparently done so. One such example is youth-led research projects, which involve a core group of children and young people, over a set amount of time, with facilitating adults and organisations. This chapter considers how the young researchers and projects claim credibility and legitimacy, through processes of knowledge production. By emphasising expertise, these projects resist perennial critiques of children and young people’s participation being unrepresentative. But they create inequalities for those with less time, interest or commitment for in-depth involvement. The chapter concludes that such projects are not radical in challenging the norms of legitimacy and credibility but can be in positioning children and young people as knowledge producers.
有意义、有效和可持续?儿童和青年参与的挑战
在《联合国儿童权利公约》的推动下,儿童和青少年参与的活动不断增加。随着活动的激增,儿童和青年参与集体决策的常见障碍和问题也越来越多:从象征性和对决策缺乏影响力,到一些儿童和青年被过多地征求意见,而另一些儿童和青年则被边缘化。虽然这个列表令人沮丧地熟悉,但某些活动似乎解决了所有或大部分这些障碍和问题。这些例子提供了潜在的学习工具,来检验为什么他们显然是这样做的。一个这样的例子是青年主导的研究项目,它涉及一个由儿童和年轻人组成的核心小组,在一定的时间内,为成年人和组织提供便利。这一章考虑了年轻的研究人员和项目如何通过知识生产过程来要求可信度和合法性。通过强调专业知识,这些项目抵制了儿童和年轻人参与不具代表性的长期批评。但对于那些没有时间、兴趣或承诺深入参与的人来说,它们造成了不平等。本章的结论是,这些项目在挑战合法性和可信度的规范方面并不激进,但可以将儿童和年轻人定位为知识生产者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信