Are catastrophizing and kinesiophobia associated with disability in patients with chronic neck pain ?

Yuh Yamashita, H. Kogo, Tomohiko Nishigami, T. Higashi
{"title":"Are catastrophizing and kinesiophobia associated with disability in patients with chronic neck pain ?","authors":"Yuh Yamashita, H. Kogo, Tomohiko Nishigami, T. Higashi","doi":"10.9759/HPPT.8.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[Objective] This study was aimed at investigating whether catastrophizing and kinesiophobia might be involved in the disability disorders of patients with chronic neck pain. [Methods] This cross-sectional study included 99 participants with chronic neck pain, of whom 35 had a traumatic onset and 64 had a non-traumatic onset. The participants completed the questionnaires on Neck Disability Index (NDI), pain intensity, pain duration, Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK). Differences in ordinal data between the groups were determined using the Mann-Whitney U test. Furthermore, multiple regression analysis (stepwise method) was used for examining the relative contribution of each variable to disability. [Results] The traumatic group had significant symptoms for a shorter duration of pain as compared with the non-traumatic group. The multiple regression analysis revealed that the NDI can be significantly predicted by catastrophizing and pain intensity. [Conclusions] This study suggests that in the patients with chronic neck pain, catastrophizing was associated with disability, regardless of traumatic or non-traumatic onset.","PeriodicalId":225008,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Health Promotion and Physical Therapy","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Health Promotion and Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9759/HPPT.8.101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

[Objective] This study was aimed at investigating whether catastrophizing and kinesiophobia might be involved in the disability disorders of patients with chronic neck pain. [Methods] This cross-sectional study included 99 participants with chronic neck pain, of whom 35 had a traumatic onset and 64 had a non-traumatic onset. The participants completed the questionnaires on Neck Disability Index (NDI), pain intensity, pain duration, Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK). Differences in ordinal data between the groups were determined using the Mann-Whitney U test. Furthermore, multiple regression analysis (stepwise method) was used for examining the relative contribution of each variable to disability. [Results] The traumatic group had significant symptoms for a shorter duration of pain as compared with the non-traumatic group. The multiple regression analysis revealed that the NDI can be significantly predicted by catastrophizing and pain intensity. [Conclusions] This study suggests that in the patients with chronic neck pain, catastrophizing was associated with disability, regardless of traumatic or non-traumatic onset.
慢性颈痛患者的灾难化和运动恐惧症与残疾有关吗?
【目的】探讨慢性颈痛患者的失能障碍是否与灾难化和运动恐惧症有关。[方法]本横断面研究纳入99例慢性颈部疼痛患者,其中35例为外伤性发作,64例为非外伤性发作。受试者完成颈部失能指数(NDI)、疼痛强度、疼痛持续时间、疼痛灾难化量表(PCS)和坦帕运动恐惧症量表(TSK)问卷。使用Mann-Whitney U检验确定组间有序数据的差异。此外,采用多元回归分析(逐步方法)来检验每个变量对残疾的相对贡献。[结果]与非创伤组相比,创伤组有明显的疼痛症状,持续时间较短。多元回归分析显示,灾难化和疼痛强度对NDI有显著的预测作用。【结论】本研究提示慢性颈部疼痛患者,灾难化与残疾相关,无论创伤性或非创伤性发病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信