Corporate Control Contests and the Disciplining Effect of Spin-Offs: A Theory of Performance and Value Improvements in Spin-Offs

Thomas J. Chemmanur, An Yan
{"title":"Corporate Control Contests and the Disciplining Effect of Spin-Offs: A Theory of Performance and Value Improvements in Spin-Offs","authors":"Thomas J. Chemmanur, An Yan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.296984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We develop a new rationale for the performance and value improvements of firms following corporate spin-offs. We consider a situation of a firm with multiple divisions, where incumbent management may have differing abilities for managing various divisions. Giving up control to a rival with better ability in managing the firm, while it benefits equity holders (including incumbent management) by increasing the firm's equity market value, also involves losing the incumbent's benefits from control. Due to this trade-off, the incumbent, while willing to relinquish control to extremely high ability rivals, may not wish to do so for rivals who have only moderately higher management ability relative to him. Spin-offs increase the chance of loss of control to potential rivals in two ways: First, it reduces the ability of the incumbent to use firm size strategically against the rival in a control contest (after the spin-off, the rival can invest to the full extent of his wealth in the equity of the firm more vulnerable to a takeover). Second, it increases the probability that passive investors will vote with the rival in a contest for control for at least one division (in a joint firm, the superior management ability of any rival with respect to one division may be neutralized by inferior ability with respect to another one). This increased chance of loss of control following a spin-off, in turn, motivates the incumbent to work harder (despite his disutility for effort) in equilibrium in an attempt to maintain control. Thus, the increase in equity market value of the firm upon spin-off announcements arises not only from market participants incorporating in their valuations the increased probability of a takeover by a more able rival for control, but also from their anticipating the increase in managerial efficiency arising from the disciplining effect of the spin-off on firm management. Our analysis predicts that, in addition to positive announcement effects, the equity of a sample of spun-off firms will also exhibit long-term positive abnormal returns under certain conditions. Our model also explains a wide variety of other recently documented empirical regularities, and provides hypotheses for further empirical work.","PeriodicalId":113288,"journal":{"name":"Gabelli School of Business","volume":"6 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gabelli School of Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.296984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

We develop a new rationale for the performance and value improvements of firms following corporate spin-offs. We consider a situation of a firm with multiple divisions, where incumbent management may have differing abilities for managing various divisions. Giving up control to a rival with better ability in managing the firm, while it benefits equity holders (including incumbent management) by increasing the firm's equity market value, also involves losing the incumbent's benefits from control. Due to this trade-off, the incumbent, while willing to relinquish control to extremely high ability rivals, may not wish to do so for rivals who have only moderately higher management ability relative to him. Spin-offs increase the chance of loss of control to potential rivals in two ways: First, it reduces the ability of the incumbent to use firm size strategically against the rival in a control contest (after the spin-off, the rival can invest to the full extent of his wealth in the equity of the firm more vulnerable to a takeover). Second, it increases the probability that passive investors will vote with the rival in a contest for control for at least one division (in a joint firm, the superior management ability of any rival with respect to one division may be neutralized by inferior ability with respect to another one). This increased chance of loss of control following a spin-off, in turn, motivates the incumbent to work harder (despite his disutility for effort) in equilibrium in an attempt to maintain control. Thus, the increase in equity market value of the firm upon spin-off announcements arises not only from market participants incorporating in their valuations the increased probability of a takeover by a more able rival for control, but also from their anticipating the increase in managerial efficiency arising from the disciplining effect of the spin-off on firm management. Our analysis predicts that, in addition to positive announcement effects, the equity of a sample of spun-off firms will also exhibit long-term positive abnormal returns under certain conditions. Our model also explains a wide variety of other recently documented empirical regularities, and provides hypotheses for further empirical work.
公司控制权竞争与分拆的约束效应:一种分拆绩效与价值提升理论
我们为公司分拆后公司的绩效和价值改进开发了一个新的理论基础。我们考虑一个有多个部门的公司的情况,其中现任管理层可能有不同的能力来管理不同的部门。将控制权让给管理能力更强的竞争对手,虽然通过增加公司的股权市场价值使股东(包括现任管理层)受益,但也意味着现任管理层失去了控制权带来的利益。由于这种权衡,现任者虽然愿意将控制权交给能力极高的竞争对手,但可能不希望将控制权交给管理能力相对于自己略高的竞争对手。分拆从两个方面增加了潜在竞争对手失去控制权的机会:首先,它降低了在位者在控制权竞争中利用公司规模的战略能力(分拆后,竞争对手可以将其全部财富投资于更容易被收购的公司的股权)。其次,它增加了被动投资者在争夺至少一个部门控制权的竞争中投票给竞争对手的可能性(在合资公司中,任何竞争对手在一个部门方面的优越管理能力可能被在另一个部门方面的劣势能力所抵消)。分拆后失去控制权的可能性增加,反过来又会激励在职者更加努力地工作(尽管他的努力是负效用的),以保持平衡,试图保持控制权。因此,在宣布分拆后,公司股票市场价值的增加不仅源于市场参与者在其估值中考虑到被更有能力的竞争对手接管的可能性增加,而且还源于他们对分拆对公司管理层的约束效应所带来的管理效率提高的预期。我们的分析预测,除了积极的公告效应外,样本公司的股权在一定条件下也会表现出长期的正异常回报。我们的模型还解释了各种各样的其他最近记录的经验规律,并为进一步的经验工作提供了假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信