REFLECTING ON THE ROOT CAUSES OF SOUTH SUDAN SECESSION: WHAT CAN OTHER AFRICAN LEADERS LEARN?

C. H. Vhumbunu
{"title":"REFLECTING ON THE ROOT CAUSES OF SOUTH SUDAN SECESSION: WHAT CAN OTHER AFRICAN LEADERS LEARN?","authors":"C. H. Vhumbunu","doi":"10.18820/24150509/JCH43.V2.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The secession of South Sudan from Sudan in 2011 remains a significant development on Africa’s political landscape. It will continue to shape and influence the direction of secessionist conflict management and resolution dynamics on the continent. This is not because it was the first secession case in Africa given the fact that, previously, Eritrea had seceded from Ethiopia in 1993. Rather, unlike the Eritrea-Ethiopian case, the South Sudan secession case has a unique and edifying pre- and post- colonial historical narrative whose instructive value to post-colonial governments and governance processes in Africa remains remotely studied and utilized. Despite numerous research on pre-secession Sudan, there has been limited constructively aligned research that unravels the root causes of South Sudan secession, and sift lessons that can be progressively applied to either avoid and prevent secession in Africa, or constructively manage secessionist pressures in a way that retains peace, stability and national development. Using secondary data analysis, this paper explores the root causes of South Sudan secession with a view to discern and deduce adaptable and appropriate lessons that can be learnt by African governments at a time when secessionist conflicts are on the rise.","PeriodicalId":409914,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Contemporary History","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Contemporary History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18820/24150509/JCH43.V2.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The secession of South Sudan from Sudan in 2011 remains a significant development on Africa’s political landscape. It will continue to shape and influence the direction of secessionist conflict management and resolution dynamics on the continent. This is not because it was the first secession case in Africa given the fact that, previously, Eritrea had seceded from Ethiopia in 1993. Rather, unlike the Eritrea-Ethiopian case, the South Sudan secession case has a unique and edifying pre- and post- colonial historical narrative whose instructive value to post-colonial governments and governance processes in Africa remains remotely studied and utilized. Despite numerous research on pre-secession Sudan, there has been limited constructively aligned research that unravels the root causes of South Sudan secession, and sift lessons that can be progressively applied to either avoid and prevent secession in Africa, or constructively manage secessionist pressures in a way that retains peace, stability and national development. Using secondary data analysis, this paper explores the root causes of South Sudan secession with a view to discern and deduce adaptable and appropriate lessons that can be learnt by African governments at a time when secessionist conflicts are on the rise.
反思南苏丹分裂的根本原因:其他非洲领导人能学到什么?
2011年南苏丹脱离苏丹仍然是非洲政治格局的一个重大发展。它将继续塑造和影响非洲大陆分离主义冲突管理和解决动态的方向。这并不是因为这是非洲的第一个分裂案件,因为厄立特里亚早在1993年就从埃塞俄比亚分离出去了。相反,与厄立特里亚-埃塞俄比亚案例不同的是,南苏丹分裂案例具有独特而具有启发性的殖民前后历史叙事,其对后殖民政府和非洲治理过程的指导价值仍有待研究和利用。尽管对分离前的苏丹进行了大量研究,但在揭示南苏丹分裂的根本原因、筛选可逐步应用于避免和防止非洲分裂、或以保持和平、稳定和国家发展的方式建设性地管理分离主义压力方面的建设性一致研究有限。本文利用二手数据分析,探讨了南苏丹分裂的根本原因,以期在分裂主义冲突不断上升的情况下,辨别和推断出非洲各国政府可以借鉴的适应性和适当的经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信