The Privatisation Experience in Banking and Insurance in Australia

M. McKenzie, M. Keneley
{"title":"The Privatisation Experience in Banking and Insurance in Australia","authors":"M. McKenzie, M. Keneley","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1458249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The role of ownership in performance of financial institutions is under-examined yet remains a topical issue. Whilst ownership changes in the banking sector have been evaluated in several studies, the link with other sectors has not been a focus of in depth analysis. A controlled comparison of performance between privatising banks and insurance firms in Australia is undertaken via a ‘meso’ approach of pairing privatising with comparator private institutions across the event period. Performance is evaluated using commercial CAMEL indicators and applying Wilcoxon rank tests (Otchere and Chan 2003) which provide statistically robust findings in the small annual data samples available around the privatisation event. Performance of privatising and private institutions is found to be quite similar before and after the event. For the privatising banks, some indicator medians improved to commercial levels (CBA) or were mostly unchanged (Colonial). By contrast one of the privatising insurance institutions (Suncorp) was found to outperform the private insurance comparator while there was little difference for the other (GIO).","PeriodicalId":326490,"journal":{"name":"ACCEPTED PAPERS","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACCEPTED PAPERS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1458249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The role of ownership in performance of financial institutions is under-examined yet remains a topical issue. Whilst ownership changes in the banking sector have been evaluated in several studies, the link with other sectors has not been a focus of in depth analysis. A controlled comparison of performance between privatising banks and insurance firms in Australia is undertaken via a ‘meso’ approach of pairing privatising with comparator private institutions across the event period. Performance is evaluated using commercial CAMEL indicators and applying Wilcoxon rank tests (Otchere and Chan 2003) which provide statistically robust findings in the small annual data samples available around the privatisation event. Performance of privatising and private institutions is found to be quite similar before and after the event. For the privatising banks, some indicator medians improved to commercial levels (CBA) or were mostly unchanged (Colonial). By contrast one of the privatising insurance institutions (Suncorp) was found to outperform the private insurance comparator while there was little difference for the other (GIO).
澳大利亚银行业和保险业私有化的经验
所有权在金融机构绩效中的作用尚未得到充分研究,但仍是一个热门话题。虽然银行业的所有权变化已经在几项研究中进行了评估,但与其他部门的联系尚未成为深入分析的重点。通过在整个活动期间将私有化与比较私人机构配对的“中间”方法,对澳大利亚私有化银行和保险公司之间的表现进行了对照比较。使用商业CAMEL指标并应用Wilcoxon秩检验(Otchere和Chan 2003)对业绩进行评估,该检验在私有化事件周围可用的小型年度数据样本中提供了统计上可靠的发现。研究发现,私有化和私营机构在私有化前后的表现非常相似。对于私有化的银行,一些指标中位数提高到商业水平(CBA),或大部分保持不变(Colonial)。相比之下,其中一家私有化保险机构(Suncorp)的表现优于私营保险比较机构,而另一家(GIO)的表现几乎没有差别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信