Re-imagining Diversity: Towards an Anthropology for Disruption in UK Higher Education

Alison Macdonald
{"title":"Re-imagining Diversity: Towards an Anthropology for Disruption in UK Higher Education","authors":"Alison Macdonald","doi":"10.22582/ta.v10i1.596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From Athena Swan accreditations to Access and Widening Participation agendas, diversity training and renewed pedagogic approaches to inclusive learning, the higher education landscape is now awash with the language of ‘diversity’ as policy and practice. The institutionalisation of ‘diversity’ is a welcome method of inclusion, yet it is often reproduced as ‘happy talk’ (Bell and Hartmann 2007) that pacifies the call for meaningful structural and institutional change, silencing and even reinforcing the inequality it seeks remedy (i.e. Ahmed, 2012; Alexander, 2005; Archer, Hutchings & Ross 2003; Kirton, Greene & Dean 2007; Mohanty, 2003; Puwar, 2004). Taking these paradoxical dimensions of diversity as ethnographic and conceptual points of departure, this special issue seeks to unravel some of the everyday experiences, practices and policies encoded in diversity ‘speak’ and ‘diversity work’ (Ahmed 2012) across anthropology departments in the UK. By giving credence to accounts of the daily graft of ‘diversity work’, together with embodied and lived experiences of what ‘being diverse’ entails on the ground, we strive to productively mobilise decentred ‘situated knowledges’ (Haraway, 1988) in order to displace the continued centrality of white / elite / heteronormative / ableist reference points at the heart of much higher education institutional diversity strategies and inclusion agendas (cf. also Puwar, 2004). For us, the term ‘re-imagining’ is a call for positive political transformation in which we hope the difficult, uncomfortable - but hopefully - fruitful questions and critiques posed by papers in this special issue galvanise a space for diverse-led action. It is thus against this backdrop that we try to re-imagine diversity in a new light: to bear witness to those who live its effects and thereby reveal the potential to democratically and holistically re-structure anthropology from the ground up.","PeriodicalId":407748,"journal":{"name":"Teaching Anthropology","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22582/ta.v10i1.596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From Athena Swan accreditations to Access and Widening Participation agendas, diversity training and renewed pedagogic approaches to inclusive learning, the higher education landscape is now awash with the language of ‘diversity’ as policy and practice. The institutionalisation of ‘diversity’ is a welcome method of inclusion, yet it is often reproduced as ‘happy talk’ (Bell and Hartmann 2007) that pacifies the call for meaningful structural and institutional change, silencing and even reinforcing the inequality it seeks remedy (i.e. Ahmed, 2012; Alexander, 2005; Archer, Hutchings & Ross 2003; Kirton, Greene & Dean 2007; Mohanty, 2003; Puwar, 2004). Taking these paradoxical dimensions of diversity as ethnographic and conceptual points of departure, this special issue seeks to unravel some of the everyday experiences, practices and policies encoded in diversity ‘speak’ and ‘diversity work’ (Ahmed 2012) across anthropology departments in the UK. By giving credence to accounts of the daily graft of ‘diversity work’, together with embodied and lived experiences of what ‘being diverse’ entails on the ground, we strive to productively mobilise decentred ‘situated knowledges’ (Haraway, 1988) in order to displace the continued centrality of white / elite / heteronormative / ableist reference points at the heart of much higher education institutional diversity strategies and inclusion agendas (cf. also Puwar, 2004). For us, the term ‘re-imagining’ is a call for positive political transformation in which we hope the difficult, uncomfortable - but hopefully - fruitful questions and critiques posed by papers in this special issue galvanise a space for diverse-led action. It is thus against this backdrop that we try to re-imagine diversity in a new light: to bear witness to those who live its effects and thereby reveal the potential to democratically and holistically re-structure anthropology from the ground up.
重新想象多样性:走向英国高等教育中断的人类学
从雅典娜·斯旺认证到准入和扩大参与议程,多样性培训和更新的教学方法,到包容性学习,高等教育领域现在充斥着“多样性”作为政策和实践的语言。“多样性”的制度化是一种受欢迎的包容方法,但它经常被复制为“愉快的谈话”(Bell and Hartmann 2007),安抚了对有意义的结构和制度变革的呼吁,沉默甚至加强了它寻求补救的不平等(即Ahmed, 2012;亚历山大,2005;Archer, Hutchings & Ross 2003;Kirton, Greene & Dean 2007;莫汉蒂,2003;Puwar, 2004)。将这些矛盾的多样性维度作为人种学和概念的出发点,本期特刊试图揭示英国人类学部门在多样性“说话”和“多样性工作”(Ahmed 2012)中编码的一些日常经验、实践和政策。通过对“多元化工作”的日常移花移地的描述,以及“多元化”所带来的具体和生活经验的信任,我们努力有效地动员去中心化的“定位知识”(Haraway, 1988),以取代白人/精英/异性恋规范/能力主义参考点在高等教育机构多样性战略和包容性议程中的持续中心地位(参见Puwar, 2004)。对我们来说,“重新想象”一词是对积极政治转型的呼吁,我们希望本期特刊中论文提出的困难、不舒服——但希望——富有成效的问题和批评,能激发出一个以多元化为主导的行动空间。因此,正是在这种背景下,我们试图以一种新的视角重新想象多样性:见证那些生活在多样性影响下的人,从而揭示从根本上民主地、全面地重建人类学的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信