THE LECTOTYPE AND TYPE LOCALITY OF CANDOIA CARINATA (REPTILIA, SERPENTES)

W. Bohme, Hobart M. Smith, J. Rybak, F. Breukelen, D. Chiszar
{"title":"THE LECTOTYPE AND TYPE LOCALITY OF CANDOIA CARINATA (REPTILIA, SERPENTES)","authors":"W. Bohme, Hobart M. Smith, J. Rybak, F. Breukelen, D. Chiszar","doi":"10.17161/ch.vi1.11951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the type locality of Schneider’s Boa carinata (1801: 261-263) has been unknown (Stimson, 1969) ever since the species was described, no great problem was posed thereby until Stull (1956) ventured to describe and name a subspecies of it, E. c. paulsoni. Later, the review of the species by McDowell (1979) revealed considerable geographic variation suggestive of taxonomic differentiation, although the picture he obtained was considered inconclusive and no subspecies were recognized. Our own studies of geographic variation indicate that the species as currently recognized does indeed constitute a complex of several taxa. Resolution of nomenclature for those taxa hinges upon fi xation of the earliest name applied in the complex, Schneider’s Boa carinata. In the absence of type locality, application of Schneider’s name would hinge solely on characteristics of the onomatophore (name bearer; Simpson, 1940). Schneider based his name on eight syntypes, without designation of any one as the onomatophore. As summarized by McDowell (1979), Schneider cited one specimen in the Ludwigian collection, two in the Lampian collection, fi ve in the Museum of the Duke of Brunswick, and one in the Göttingen Museum. The latter was most fully described by Schneider, and was designated by McDowell as the lectotype, which he thought was “probably lost.” Nevertheless, on the basis of the number of ventrals and caudals, and other data in the original description, McDowell concluded that the type locality probably was in the “South Moluccas.” Inasmuch as greater certainty of the geographic origin and identity of the name-bearer for Candoia carinata, as the species is now known, appears desirable (in view of the several taxa that now seem to be involved), a concerted effort to determine the fate of the lectotype revealed that the specimen does indeed exist, and is now No. 35503 in the Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut und ABSTRACT: The lectotype of Boa carinata Schneider, 1801, has been rediscovered and is now ZMFK 35503, having been transferred in 1977 from the Göttingen Museum, its original location. Its type locality has not been reported previously, but is indicated as “Amboina” on a label with the lectotype. The specimen is redescribed and fi gured, and conforms with expectations for material from the vicinity of the type locality. A brief history of Schneider and of the syntypes of Boa carinata, now Candoia carinata, is reviewed.","PeriodicalId":173367,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Herpetology","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Herpetology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/ch.vi1.11951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Although the type locality of Schneider’s Boa carinata (1801: 261-263) has been unknown (Stimson, 1969) ever since the species was described, no great problem was posed thereby until Stull (1956) ventured to describe and name a subspecies of it, E. c. paulsoni. Later, the review of the species by McDowell (1979) revealed considerable geographic variation suggestive of taxonomic differentiation, although the picture he obtained was considered inconclusive and no subspecies were recognized. Our own studies of geographic variation indicate that the species as currently recognized does indeed constitute a complex of several taxa. Resolution of nomenclature for those taxa hinges upon fi xation of the earliest name applied in the complex, Schneider’s Boa carinata. In the absence of type locality, application of Schneider’s name would hinge solely on characteristics of the onomatophore (name bearer; Simpson, 1940). Schneider based his name on eight syntypes, without designation of any one as the onomatophore. As summarized by McDowell (1979), Schneider cited one specimen in the Ludwigian collection, two in the Lampian collection, fi ve in the Museum of the Duke of Brunswick, and one in the Göttingen Museum. The latter was most fully described by Schneider, and was designated by McDowell as the lectotype, which he thought was “probably lost.” Nevertheless, on the basis of the number of ventrals and caudals, and other data in the original description, McDowell concluded that the type locality probably was in the “South Moluccas.” Inasmuch as greater certainty of the geographic origin and identity of the name-bearer for Candoia carinata, as the species is now known, appears desirable (in view of the several taxa that now seem to be involved), a concerted effort to determine the fate of the lectotype revealed that the specimen does indeed exist, and is now No. 35503 in the Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut und ABSTRACT: The lectotype of Boa carinata Schneider, 1801, has been rediscovered and is now ZMFK 35503, having been transferred in 1977 from the Göttingen Museum, its original location. Its type locality has not been reported previously, but is indicated as “Amboina” on a label with the lectotype. The specimen is redescribed and fi gured, and conforms with expectations for material from the vicinity of the type locality. A brief history of Schneider and of the syntypes of Boa carinata, now Candoia carinata, is reviewed.
龙齿念珠菌(爬行纲,蛇形纲)的形态和类型定位
尽管Schneider’s Boa carinata(1801: 261-263)的类型位置自该物种被描述以来一直是未知的(Stimson, 1969),但直到Stull(1956)冒险描述并命名了它的一个亚种e.c. paulsoni,才引起了很大的问题。后来,McDowell(1979)对该物种进行了回顾,发现了相当大的地理变异,暗示了分类分化,尽管他获得的图像被认为是不确定的,没有亚种被识别出来。我们自己对地理变异的研究表明,目前公认的物种确实是由几个分类群组成的复合体。要解决这些分类群的命名问题,就得先确定这个复杂群落中最早使用的名字——施耐德的美洲蛇(Boa carina)。在没有类型局部性的情况下,施耐德名字的使用将仅仅取决于拟声词(名字持有者;辛普森,1940)。施耐德以八种类型为基础命名,没有指定任何一种为拟声词。正如麦克道尔(1979)所总结的那样,施耐德引用了路德维希收藏的一个标本,兰皮亚收藏的两个标本,不伦瑞克公爵博物馆的五个标本,Göttingen博物馆的一个标本。施耐德对后者进行了最全面的描述,麦克道尔认为它“可能已经丢失”,并将其指定为lectotype。然而,根据腹侧和尾侧的数量,以及原始描述中的其他数据,麦克道尔得出结论,该类型的地点可能在“南摩鹿加群岛”。由于对该物种现在所知的carinata的地理起源和命名者的身份有更大的确定性似乎是必要的(考虑到现在似乎涉及的几个分类群),为确定该物种的命运而进行的一致努力表明,该标本确实存在,现在在Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut和und中编号35503。1801年,Boa carinata Schneider的原型被重新发现,现在是ZMFK 35503,于1977年从Göttingen博物馆转移到原址。它的类型位置以前没有报道过,但在带有选型的标签上显示为“Amboina”。样品被重新描述和绘制,并符合对来自模式位置附近的材料的期望。简要回顾了施耐德的历史和carinata的模式,现在的Candoia carinata。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信