The Online Education in the Higher Education, a Complete System Rather Than Just a Platform

Samir Abdelaziz
{"title":"The Online Education in the Higher Education, a Complete System Rather Than Just a Platform","authors":"Samir Abdelaziz","doi":"10.11114/bms.v8i1.5536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The online education in the higher education is a complete system rather than just a platform. The participants for this research study included twenty enrollees in distance learning programs. The respondents got online instruction from two distinct higher education institutions (the University of Florida and the Florida State University). The qualitative research design chosen for this study was conducted through observations, and interviews. To begin the study, each respondent had a formal structured interview recorded and transcribed. The interviews with each respondent lasted around 60 minutes on average. Depending on the respondents' preferences, interviews were done at a convenient location, such as their workplace, the university library, or dorm room. Interviews with each participant were performed in an unstructured manner.  The following were among the favorable experiences: ease of connection, availability of technical help, self-paced learning, convenience, cost-effectiveness, and adaptability of the program. The difficulties included: a feeling of isolation, self-motivation, and self-regulation, inability to get help from the teacher, and a delay in seeking feedback. The following factors contributed to participants' positive interactions: accessibility to the internet and technology, a well-designed instructional format, easily accessible technical help from the institution, immediate grade filings following assessments, and a flexible learning participative timetable. Untimely or ineffective communication from the educator was among the variables that contributed to participants' unfavorable experiences. Other factors were boring educational approaches, a lack of technical assistance, a lack of interpersonal connection, and an inadequately-designed course interface.","PeriodicalId":278115,"journal":{"name":"Business and Management Studies","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business and Management Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11114/bms.v8i1.5536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The online education in the higher education is a complete system rather than just a platform. The participants for this research study included twenty enrollees in distance learning programs. The respondents got online instruction from two distinct higher education institutions (the University of Florida and the Florida State University). The qualitative research design chosen for this study was conducted through observations, and interviews. To begin the study, each respondent had a formal structured interview recorded and transcribed. The interviews with each respondent lasted around 60 minutes on average. Depending on the respondents' preferences, interviews were done at a convenient location, such as their workplace, the university library, or dorm room. Interviews with each participant were performed in an unstructured manner.  The following were among the favorable experiences: ease of connection, availability of technical help, self-paced learning, convenience, cost-effectiveness, and adaptability of the program. The difficulties included: a feeling of isolation, self-motivation, and self-regulation, inability to get help from the teacher, and a delay in seeking feedback. The following factors contributed to participants' positive interactions: accessibility to the internet and technology, a well-designed instructional format, easily accessible technical help from the institution, immediate grade filings following assessments, and a flexible learning participative timetable. Untimely or ineffective communication from the educator was among the variables that contributed to participants' unfavorable experiences. Other factors were boring educational approaches, a lack of technical assistance, a lack of interpersonal connection, and an inadequately-designed course interface.
高等教育中的网络教育,是一个完整的系统,而不仅仅是一个平台
高等教育中的网络教育是一个完整的系统,而不仅仅是一个平台。这项研究的参与者包括20名远程学习项目的参与者。受访者从两所不同的高等教育机构(佛罗里达大学和佛罗里达州立大学)获得在线指导。本研究选择的定性研究设计是通过观察和访谈进行的。为了开始研究,每个受访者都有一个正式的结构化访谈记录和转录。每位受访者的访谈时间平均约为60分钟。根据受访者的喜好,访谈在方便的地点进行,如工作场所、大学图书馆或宿舍。与每位参与者的访谈以非结构化的方式进行。以下是令人满意的体验:易于连接,技术帮助的可用性,自主学习,便利性,成本效益和程序的适应性。困难包括:孤立感,自我激励和自我调节,无法从老师那里得到帮助,以及寻求反馈的延迟。以下因素促成了参与者的积极互动:互联网和技术的可访问性,精心设计的教学格式,机构提供的易于获取的技术帮助,评估后立即提交成绩,以及灵活的学习参与性时间表。来自教育者的不及时或无效的沟通是导致参与者不良经历的变量之一。其他因素还包括无聊的教育方法、缺乏技术援助、缺乏人际关系以及设计不当的课程界面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信