{"title":"Chapter 4 Judah Halevi’s Fideistic Scepticism against the Backdrop of Developments in the Arabic Culture of His Time","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9783110664744-005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From the analysis in the previous chapter, the trends of dogmatic rationalism in Arabic culture have emerged as the most relevant background to the appearance of sceptical manifestations in The Kuzari. Thus, it seems fitting to point to a general historical parallel between the circumstances under which scepticism appeared in Hellenistic antiquity and the circumstances under which sceptical manifestations emerged in Judah Halevi’s thought. The Hellenistic sceptical trend formed in reaction to the establishment of the dogmatic rationalist schools, first and foremost the Stoic, Epicurean, and Aristotelian schools of thought in the fourth and third centuries BCE, while the sceptical manifestations in Halevi’s thought are a response to and a means of countering the establishment of the dogmatic rationalist schools of Arabic culture, above all the kalām and falsafah schools. For Halevi himself, as a thinker and writer active in the late eleventh and first half of the twelfth centuries, a period when the Arabic variations of Neoplatonism and Aristotelianism were prevalent among Jewish and Muslim writers in al-Andalus, the challenge posed by dogmatic rationalism as processed by the falsafah trends was greater than that posed by the thought of the kalām trends.1 In his works, Ibn Sīnā, active in the first decades of the eleventh century, presented a systematic philosophical synthesis that covered all scientific disciplines, including metaphysics, which he called “the divine sciences” (al-ilāhiyāt), which, theologically speaking, is the most significant. Ibn Sīnā’s tremendous philosophical achievement made a very profound impression on Arabic rationalists in the following generations.2 Ibn Sīnā’s thought reverberates throughout The Kuzari more strongly than that of al-Fārābī, falsafah’s important representative in the generations preceding Ibn Sīnā’s time.3 In the specific context of Halevi as an Andalusian thinker, the thought of the contemporaneous Andalusian philosopher Abū Bakr ibn Bāǧǧah (d. 1139), the first important representative of falsafah in Andalusia, also left a significant imprint on The Kuzari.4 In addition to noting the general parallel of circumstances in which classical Hellenistic scepticism appeared and the appearance of scepticism in Halevi’s thought, it is also necessary to discuss the specific historical circumstances under","PeriodicalId":170015,"journal":{"name":"Judah Halevi’s Fideistic Scepticism in the Kuzari","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judah Halevi’s Fideistic Scepticism in the Kuzari","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110664744-005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
From the analysis in the previous chapter, the trends of dogmatic rationalism in Arabic culture have emerged as the most relevant background to the appearance of sceptical manifestations in The Kuzari. Thus, it seems fitting to point to a general historical parallel between the circumstances under which scepticism appeared in Hellenistic antiquity and the circumstances under which sceptical manifestations emerged in Judah Halevi’s thought. The Hellenistic sceptical trend formed in reaction to the establishment of the dogmatic rationalist schools, first and foremost the Stoic, Epicurean, and Aristotelian schools of thought in the fourth and third centuries BCE, while the sceptical manifestations in Halevi’s thought are a response to and a means of countering the establishment of the dogmatic rationalist schools of Arabic culture, above all the kalām and falsafah schools. For Halevi himself, as a thinker and writer active in the late eleventh and first half of the twelfth centuries, a period when the Arabic variations of Neoplatonism and Aristotelianism were prevalent among Jewish and Muslim writers in al-Andalus, the challenge posed by dogmatic rationalism as processed by the falsafah trends was greater than that posed by the thought of the kalām trends.1 In his works, Ibn Sīnā, active in the first decades of the eleventh century, presented a systematic philosophical synthesis that covered all scientific disciplines, including metaphysics, which he called “the divine sciences” (al-ilāhiyāt), which, theologically speaking, is the most significant. Ibn Sīnā’s tremendous philosophical achievement made a very profound impression on Arabic rationalists in the following generations.2 Ibn Sīnā’s thought reverberates throughout The Kuzari more strongly than that of al-Fārābī, falsafah’s important representative in the generations preceding Ibn Sīnā’s time.3 In the specific context of Halevi as an Andalusian thinker, the thought of the contemporaneous Andalusian philosopher Abū Bakr ibn Bāǧǧah (d. 1139), the first important representative of falsafah in Andalusia, also left a significant imprint on The Kuzari.4 In addition to noting the general parallel of circumstances in which classical Hellenistic scepticism appeared and the appearance of scepticism in Halevi’s thought, it is also necessary to discuss the specific historical circumstances under
从前一章的分析来看,阿拉伯文化中的教条理性主义趋势已经成为《库扎里》中怀疑主义表现出现的最相关背景。因此,在希腊化的古代怀疑主义出现的环境和在犹大·哈勒维思想中出现怀疑主义表现的环境之间,似乎有一个普遍的历史平行点。希腊化的怀疑主义趋势形成于对教条主义理性主义学派的建立的反应,首先是公元前4世纪和3世纪的斯多葛学派、伊壁鸠鲁学派和亚里士多德学派,而哈勒维思想中的怀疑主义表现是对阿拉伯文化中教条主义理性主义学派的建立的回应和对抗的一种手段,首先是kalām和falsafah学派。对于Halevi本人来说,作为一个活跃在11世纪末和12世纪上半叶的思想家和作家,当新柏拉图主义和亚里士多德主义的阿拉伯变体在安达卢斯的犹太和穆斯林作家中盛行的时期,由falsafah趋势处理的教条理性主义所带来的挑战比kalām趋势的思想所带来的挑战更大在他的作品中,活跃于11世纪头十年的伊本·桑努伊提出了一个系统的哲学综合,涵盖了所有的科学学科,包括形而上学,他称之为“神圣的科学”(al-ilāhiyāt),这在神学上是最重要的。伊本·萨努伊巨大的哲学成就给后世的阿拉伯理性主义者留下了非常深刻的印象伊本·桑那的思想在整个《库扎里》中的回响比al-Fārābī更强烈,al-Fārābī是伊本·桑那时代之前几代falsafah的重要代表在Halevi作为安达卢西亚思想家的特定背景下,同时期安达卢西亚哲学家abi Bakr ibn Bāǧǧah(1139年)的思想也在《库扎里》中留下了重要的印记,他是安达卢西亚法萨法的第一位重要代表。4除了注意到古典希腊主义怀疑主义出现的环境与Halevi思想中怀疑主义的出现一般相似之外,还需要讨论具体的历史环境