Should the Decisions of the International Court of Justice and the Work of the International Law Commission be Recognized as Binding Sources of International Law?

Yinan Yu
{"title":"Should the Decisions of the International Court of Justice and the Work of the International Law Commission be Recognized as Binding Sources of International Law?","authors":"Yinan Yu","doi":"10.22457/jmhr.v07a062243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This year marks the 76th anniversary of the first sitting of the International Court of Justice, and the article 38(1) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice is considered to be one of the most authoritative guides for ICJ when deciding international disputes. However, whether this provision is complete and covers all the sources of international law are of concern. Someone argues that decisions of the International Court of Justice, and the work of the International Law Commission, should be recognized as binding sources of international law as well. This essay is going to focus on the sources of international law listed in the article 38(1) of the Statute and other possible sources which are not included in this article. In addition, it will discuss the judicial decisions of the ICJ, the work of ILC, and the reasons for not adding them into the sources of international law.","PeriodicalId":206239,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management and Humanity Research","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management and Humanity Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22457/jmhr.v07a062243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This year marks the 76th anniversary of the first sitting of the International Court of Justice, and the article 38(1) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice is considered to be one of the most authoritative guides for ICJ when deciding international disputes. However, whether this provision is complete and covers all the sources of international law are of concern. Someone argues that decisions of the International Court of Justice, and the work of the International Law Commission, should be recognized as binding sources of international law as well. This essay is going to focus on the sources of international law listed in the article 38(1) of the Statute and other possible sources which are not included in this article. In addition, it will discuss the judicial decisions of the ICJ, the work of ILC, and the reasons for not adding them into the sources of international law.
国际法院的判决和国际法委员会的工作是否应被承认为具有约束力的国际法渊源?
今年是国际法院成立76周年,《国际法院规约》第38条第1款被认为是国际法院裁决国际争端最权威的指南之一。但是,这项规定是否完整并涵盖国际法的所有渊源令人关切。有人认为,国际法院的判决和国际法委员会的工作也应被视为具有约束力的国际法渊源。本文将集中讨论《规约》第38(1)条所列的国际法渊源以及本条未包括的其他可能渊源。此外,它还将讨论国际法院的司法判决、国际法委员会的工作以及不将其列入国际法渊源的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信