Financial performance and quality, a factor-based approach for real estate benchmarking

Olivier Mege, F. Larceneux, Arnaud Simon, Paul Andriot
{"title":"Financial performance and quality, a factor-based approach for real estate benchmarking","authors":"Olivier Mege, F. Larceneux, Arnaud Simon, Paul Andriot","doi":"10.15396/eres2019_231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The indexes widely adopted by the real estate industry aims to evaluate the performance of a fund from its total return excluding the quality of the real estate property. There is a consensus around indexes based on a specific segmentation on the location (city, metropolis ...) of the property on the one hand and the typology of the asset (offices, warehouse ...) on the other hand. The construction of the index is based on a market average combining both location and typology. This indexes requiring to use many comparables. This perception of performance tends to exclude the « real » quality level of the asset in the investment decision making. Our work aims to assess the intrinsic quality of a property from its intrinsic and its financial characteristics. This methodology is based on a representative panel of the market who is in charge to evaluates the characteristics of a building. Our approach aims to add to the definition of Total Return (TR): the quality level of the building (QB), the quality of the geographical location (QL), the rental legal security (Ql) and the variation of these three levels of quality in time (bQB, bQL and bQl). Our approach aims to compare the level of management skills of an asset by an asset manager compared to the expected management of the market, on the building. That why characteriscts is no longer appreciate from a normative segmentation, but from assessments of the quality levels of the characteristics of the building. This the basis of our factor-based benchmarking approach.","PeriodicalId":152375,"journal":{"name":"26th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference","volume":"130 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"26th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15396/eres2019_231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The indexes widely adopted by the real estate industry aims to evaluate the performance of a fund from its total return excluding the quality of the real estate property. There is a consensus around indexes based on a specific segmentation on the location (city, metropolis ...) of the property on the one hand and the typology of the asset (offices, warehouse ...) on the other hand. The construction of the index is based on a market average combining both location and typology. This indexes requiring to use many comparables. This perception of performance tends to exclude the « real » quality level of the asset in the investment decision making. Our work aims to assess the intrinsic quality of a property from its intrinsic and its financial characteristics. This methodology is based on a representative panel of the market who is in charge to evaluates the characteristics of a building. Our approach aims to add to the definition of Total Return (TR): the quality level of the building (QB), the quality of the geographical location (QL), the rental legal security (Ql) and the variation of these three levels of quality in time (bQB, bQL and bQl). Our approach aims to compare the level of management skills of an asset by an asset manager compared to the expected management of the market, on the building. That why characteriscts is no longer appreciate from a normative segmentation, but from assessments of the quality levels of the characteristics of the building. This the basis of our factor-based benchmarking approach.
财务绩效和质量,房地产基准的基于因素的方法
房地产行业广泛采用的指标,是以基金的总收益来评价基金的业绩,不考虑房地产的质量。关于指数,人们达成了共识,一方面是基于物业的位置(城市、大都市等)的特定细分,另一方面是基于资产的类型(办公室、仓库等)。该指数的构建基于结合地理位置和类型的市场平均水平。这个索引需要使用许多可比性。在投资决策中,这种对业绩的感知往往会排除资产的“真实”质量水平。我们的工作旨在从其内在特征和财务特征来评估房产的内在质量。这种方法是基于一个市场代表小组,他们负责评估建筑物的特征。我们的方法旨在增加总回报(TR)的定义:建筑物的质量水平(QB),地理位置的质量(QL),租赁法律保障(QL)以及这三个质量水平的变化(bQB, bQL和bQL)。我们的方法旨在比较资产经理的资产管理技能水平与市场预期的管理水平。这就是为什么不再从规范的分割中欣赏特征,而是从对建筑特征的质量水平的评估中。这是我们基于因素的基准测试方法的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信