Revising human-systems engineering principles for embedded AI applications

M. Cummings
{"title":"Revising human-systems engineering principles for embedded AI applications","authors":"M. Cummings","doi":"10.3389/fnrgo.2023.1102165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent shift from predominantly hardware-based systems in complex settings to systems that heavily leverage non-deterministic artificial intelligence (AI) reasoning means that typical systems engineering processes must also adapt, especially when humans are direct or indirect users. Systems with embedded AI rely on probabilistic reasoning, which can fail in unexpected ways, and any overestimation of AI capabilities can result in systems with latent functionality gaps. This is especially true when humans oversee such systems, and such oversight has the potential to be deadly, but there is little-to-no consensus on how such system should be tested to ensure they can gracefully fail. To this end, this work outlines a roadmap for emerging research areas for complex human-centric systems with embedded AI. Fourteen new functional and tasks requirement considerations are proposed that highlight the interconnectedness between uncertainty and AI, as well as the role humans might need to play in the supervision and secure operation of such systems. In addition, 11 new and modified non-functional requirements, i.e., “ilities,” are provided and two new “ilities,” auditability and passive vulnerability, are also introduced. Ten problem areas with AI test, evaluation, verification and validation are noted, along with the need to determine reasonable risk estimates and acceptable thresholds for system performance. Lastly, multidisciplinary teams are needed for the design of effective and safe systems with embedded AI, and a new AI maintenance workforce should be developed for quality assurance of both underlying data and models.","PeriodicalId":207447,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neuroergonomics","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neuroergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnrgo.2023.1102165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The recent shift from predominantly hardware-based systems in complex settings to systems that heavily leverage non-deterministic artificial intelligence (AI) reasoning means that typical systems engineering processes must also adapt, especially when humans are direct or indirect users. Systems with embedded AI rely on probabilistic reasoning, which can fail in unexpected ways, and any overestimation of AI capabilities can result in systems with latent functionality gaps. This is especially true when humans oversee such systems, and such oversight has the potential to be deadly, but there is little-to-no consensus on how such system should be tested to ensure they can gracefully fail. To this end, this work outlines a roadmap for emerging research areas for complex human-centric systems with embedded AI. Fourteen new functional and tasks requirement considerations are proposed that highlight the interconnectedness between uncertainty and AI, as well as the role humans might need to play in the supervision and secure operation of such systems. In addition, 11 new and modified non-functional requirements, i.e., “ilities,” are provided and two new “ilities,” auditability and passive vulnerability, are also introduced. Ten problem areas with AI test, evaluation, verification and validation are noted, along with the need to determine reasonable risk estimates and acceptable thresholds for system performance. Lastly, multidisciplinary teams are needed for the design of effective and safe systems with embedded AI, and a new AI maintenance workforce should be developed for quality assurance of both underlying data and models.
修订嵌入式人工智能应用的人-系统工程原理
最近从复杂环境中主要基于硬件的系统转向大量利用非确定性人工智能(AI)推理的系统,这意味着典型的系统工程过程也必须适应,特别是当人类是直接或间接用户时。嵌入式人工智能系统依赖于概率推理,这可能会以意想不到的方式失败,对人工智能能力的任何高估都可能导致系统存在潜在的功能缺口。当人类监督这样的系统时尤其如此,这种监督有可能是致命的,但对于如何测试这样的系统以确保它们能够优雅地失败,几乎没有达成共识。为此,本工作概述了具有嵌入式人工智能的复杂以人为中心的系统的新兴研究领域的路线图。提出了14项新的功能和任务需求考虑因素,强调了不确定性与人工智能之间的相互联系,以及人类在监督和安全操作这些系统中可能需要发挥的作用。此外,还提供了11个新的和修改过的非功能需求,即“功能”,并且还引入了两个新的“功能”,可审核性和被动脆弱性。注意到AI测试、评估、验证和确认的十个问题领域,以及确定系统性能的合理风险估计和可接受阈值的需要。最后,需要多学科团队来设计具有嵌入式人工智能的有效和安全的系统,并且应该开发新的人工智能维护人员来保证底层数据和模型的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信