Testing Backlash: The Influence of Political Institutions on Public Attitudes Toward Gay Rights

Benjamin G. Bishin, T. Hayes, Matthew B. Incantalupo, C. Smith
{"title":"Testing Backlash: The Influence of Political Institutions on Public Attitudes Toward Gay Rights","authors":"Benjamin G. Bishin, T. Hayes, Matthew B. Incantalupo, C. Smith","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2279675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent litigation contesting marriage equality has been controversial in part because the claim is sometimes made that public opinion sways against those who obtain rights through courts. That is, the fear of backlash has been used to discourage litigation over equality. We provide the first rigorous assessment of backlash. We begin with an experiment designed to induce backlash in response to policy that promotes the interests of gays and lesbians. We test the degree to which backlash occurs on the general population using Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk (MTurk) program to recruit subjects into an online survey with an embedded experiment. We then determine who is most sensitive to the stimuli and whether backlash is triggered solely by policy or whether it can also be triggered by a perception of activism by, or increased societal acceptance of, gays and lesbians. We validate these results using data from national public opinion polls conducted over time. We demonstrate which citizens are most likely to experience backlash, identify how backlash manifests (whether through changed issue position, increased issue intensity, or both) and identify which institutions (courts or legislatures) are most likely to trigger backlash. We also take advantage of the DOMA and Prop 8 oral arguments to conduct a natural experiment. We show that gays and lesbians should not hesitate to litigate as backlash is modest and no different whether success is obtained through courts or legislatures.","PeriodicalId":203673,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Other Political Behavior: Race","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Other Political Behavior: Race","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2279675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Recent litigation contesting marriage equality has been controversial in part because the claim is sometimes made that public opinion sways against those who obtain rights through courts. That is, the fear of backlash has been used to discourage litigation over equality. We provide the first rigorous assessment of backlash. We begin with an experiment designed to induce backlash in response to policy that promotes the interests of gays and lesbians. We test the degree to which backlash occurs on the general population using Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk (MTurk) program to recruit subjects into an online survey with an embedded experiment. We then determine who is most sensitive to the stimuli and whether backlash is triggered solely by policy or whether it can also be triggered by a perception of activism by, or increased societal acceptance of, gays and lesbians. We validate these results using data from national public opinion polls conducted over time. We demonstrate which citizens are most likely to experience backlash, identify how backlash manifests (whether through changed issue position, increased issue intensity, or both) and identify which institutions (courts or legislatures) are most likely to trigger backlash. We also take advantage of the DOMA and Prop 8 oral arguments to conduct a natural experiment. We show that gays and lesbians should not hesitate to litigate as backlash is modest and no different whether success is obtained through courts or legislatures.
测试反弹:政治制度对公众对同性恋权利态度的影响
最近有关婚姻平等的诉讼一直备受争议,部分原因是有时有人声称,公众舆论对那些通过法院获得权利的人不利。也就是说,对反弹的恐惧已经被用来阻止关于平等的诉讼。我们提供了对反弹的第一个严格评估。我们从一个实验开始,这个实验旨在引起人们对促进男女同性恋者利益的政策的强烈反对。我们使用亚马逊公司的土耳其机械(MTurk)程序来测试大众对这种抵制的程度,该程序通过嵌入式实验招募受试者进行在线调查。然后,我们确定谁对刺激最敏感,以及反弹是否仅仅是由政策引发的,还是也可能是由对同性恋者的激进主义的看法或社会对同性恋者的接受程度增加而引发的。我们使用长期以来进行的全国民意调查数据来验证这些结果。我们展示了哪些公民最有可能经历反弹,确定反弹是如何表现的(无论是通过改变问题立场,增加问题强度,还是两者兼而有之),并确定哪些机构(法院或立法机构)最有可能引发反弹。我们还利用《婚姻保护法》和第8号提案的口头辩论来进行自然实验。我们表明,同性恋者应该毫不犹豫地提起诉讼,因为反对是温和的,无论通过法院还是立法机构获得成功,都没有什么不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信