The United States Food Drug Administration’s Innovative Alternative Tools to Evaluate Good Clinical Practice During the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency

Kassa Ayalew, Jenn W. Sellers, Phillip D. Kronstein, Laurie Muldowney, Emily Gebbia, Jean Mulinde, David Burrow
{"title":"The United States Food Drug Administration’s Innovative Alternative Tools to Evaluate Good Clinical Practice During the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency","authors":"Kassa Ayalew, Jenn W. Sellers, Phillip D. Kronstein, Laurie Muldowney, Emily Gebbia, Jean Mulinde, David Burrow","doi":"10.47912/jscdm.216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundThe COVID-19 public health emergency limited the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s ability to conduct on-site good clinical practice (GCP) inspections. Alternative tools therefore have been used by FDA during the pandemic to evaluate the reliability and integrity of clinical trial data for marketing applications. However, no systematic assessment of the pandemic impact on in-person GCP inspections has been conducted. In addition, the alternative tools and their contribution to GCP oversight have not been reported.   MethodsThis retrospective study reviewed databases internal to FDA and identified and characterized alternative tools used in lieu of on-site GCP inspections in fiscal year (FY)*2020 and FY2021. The impact of the pandemic on on-site GCP inspections and the contribution of alternative tools to overall GCP activities** were described. ResultsBetween April 13, 2020, and September 30, 2021, FDA conducted 77 GCP evaluations using alternative tools. Alternative tools were used most commonly for GCP evaluations of non-U.S. clinical investigators in support of mission critical, original New Drug Applications (NDAs). FDA conduced 370 on-site GCP inspections in FY2020 and 451 in FY2021, which represented a 23% and 6% decrease, respectively, compared to the yearly average of 481 on-site GCP inspections in the 5 years preceding the pandemic. The use of alternative tools contributed 10% and 8% to total GCP activities in FY2020 and FY2021, respectively.ConclusionGCP evaluations using alternative tools have played a significant role in GCP activities supporting the review of marketing applications during the COVID-19 public health emergency. KeywordsCOVID-19 pandemic, public health emergency, remote regulatory assessment (RRA), good clinical practice, remote inspection, FDA. *Fiscal year is defined as from October 1 to September 30.**GCP activities in this paper refers to on-site inspections and GCP evaluations using alternative tools conducted by the Office of Regulatory Affairs or the GCP Assessment Branch in the Division of Clinical Compliance Evaluation in the Office of Scientific Investigations in support of marketing applications submitted to the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research at FDA. ","PeriodicalId":440423,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Clinical Data Management","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for Clinical Data Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47912/jscdm.216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThe COVID-19 public health emergency limited the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s ability to conduct on-site good clinical practice (GCP) inspections. Alternative tools therefore have been used by FDA during the pandemic to evaluate the reliability and integrity of clinical trial data for marketing applications. However, no systematic assessment of the pandemic impact on in-person GCP inspections has been conducted. In addition, the alternative tools and their contribution to GCP oversight have not been reported.   MethodsThis retrospective study reviewed databases internal to FDA and identified and characterized alternative tools used in lieu of on-site GCP inspections in fiscal year (FY)*2020 and FY2021. The impact of the pandemic on on-site GCP inspections and the contribution of alternative tools to overall GCP activities** were described. ResultsBetween April 13, 2020, and September 30, 2021, FDA conducted 77 GCP evaluations using alternative tools. Alternative tools were used most commonly for GCP evaluations of non-U.S. clinical investigators in support of mission critical, original New Drug Applications (NDAs). FDA conduced 370 on-site GCP inspections in FY2020 and 451 in FY2021, which represented a 23% and 6% decrease, respectively, compared to the yearly average of 481 on-site GCP inspections in the 5 years preceding the pandemic. The use of alternative tools contributed 10% and 8% to total GCP activities in FY2020 and FY2021, respectively.ConclusionGCP evaluations using alternative tools have played a significant role in GCP activities supporting the review of marketing applications during the COVID-19 public health emergency. KeywordsCOVID-19 pandemic, public health emergency, remote regulatory assessment (RRA), good clinical practice, remote inspection, FDA. *Fiscal year is defined as from October 1 to September 30.**GCP activities in this paper refers to on-site inspections and GCP evaluations using alternative tools conducted by the Office of Regulatory Affairs or the GCP Assessment Branch in the Division of Clinical Compliance Evaluation in the Office of Scientific Investigations in support of marketing applications submitted to the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research at FDA. 
美国食品药品管理局在COVID-19突发公共卫生事件期间评估良好临床实践的创新替代工具
COVID-19突发公共卫生事件限制了美国食品和药物管理局进行现场良好临床规范(GCP)检查的能力。因此,FDA在大流行期间使用了替代工具来评估用于营销应用的临床试验数据的可靠性和完整性。然而,尚未对大流行对现场GCP检查的影响进行系统评估。此外,还没有报告替代工具及其对GCP监督的贡献。方法:本回顾性研究回顾了FDA内部数据库,确定并描述了2020财年和2021财年替代现场GCP检查的替代工具。介绍了大流行病对全球防治方案现场视察的影响以及替代工具对全球防治方案总体活动的贡献**。结果在2020年4月13日至2021年9月30日期间,FDA使用替代工具进行了77次GCP评估。替代工具最常用于非美国的GCP评估。支持关键任务的临床研究人员,原始新药申请(NDAs)。FDA在2020财年和2021财年分别进行了370次和451次现场GCP检查,与大流行前5年平均每年481次现场GCP检查相比,分别减少了23%和6%。在2020财年和2021财年,替代工具的使用分别占GCP活动总量的10%和8%。结论在COVID-19突发公共卫生事件期间,使用替代工具进行的cp评估在支持市场申请审查的GCP活动中发挥了重要作用。关键词:新型冠状病毒肺炎大流行突发公共卫生事件远程监管评估良好临床规范远程检查FDA*财政年度的定义为10月1日至9月30日。**本文中的GCP活动是指由监管事务办公室或科学调查办公室临床依从性评价部GCP评估处进行的现场检查和使用替代工具进行的GCP评估,以支持向FDA药物评价和研究中心提交的上市申请。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信