Analisis Penerapan Job Order Costing Method Terhadap Harga Pokok Produksi Untuk Meningkatkan Akurasi Harga Jual Produk Pada Maju Jaya Aluminium Kecamatan Cina Kabupaten Bone

Martinah Martinah, Muctar Nuhung
{"title":"Analisis Penerapan Job Order Costing Method Terhadap Harga Pokok Produksi Untuk Meningkatkan Akurasi Harga Jual Produk Pada Maju Jaya Aluminium Kecamatan Cina Kabupaten Bone","authors":"Martinah Martinah, Muctar Nuhung","doi":"10.30863/AL-TSARWAH.V1I2.260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to compare the cost of the 2M CA type of storefront production that has been applied in Forward Jaya Aluminum by calculating the production cost principle using the job order costing method. Data is collected through observation, interviews, and documentation. Furthermore, the data is analyzed using qualitative methods. While the calculation method used in this study is the method of job order costing or the cost of the order. The results of the study found that the calculation of the cost of production of type 2 M CA storefront was IDR 1,300,000 with a set profit rate of 19.6% with a selling price of IDR 1,550,000, while the calculation using the job order costing method was equal to Rp 1,329,217 with a selling price of Rp 1,589,744 with a profit rate of 19.6%. Based on the results of his analysis, the difference in the calculation of cost of goods manufactured is due to the fact that Maju Jaya Aluminum does not identify in detail the elements of the cost of production, so the cost of production calculated by Maju Jaya Aluminum is lower than using the job order costing method. We recommend that Maju Jaya Aluminum correct the calculation of cost of goods manufactured according to the job order costing method by calculating and identifying raw material costs, direct labor costs, and factory head costs so that the specified selling price can be accurate and increase.","PeriodicalId":224452,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Tsarwah","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Tsarwah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30863/AL-TSARWAH.V1I2.260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aims to compare the cost of the 2M CA type of storefront production that has been applied in Forward Jaya Aluminum by calculating the production cost principle using the job order costing method. Data is collected through observation, interviews, and documentation. Furthermore, the data is analyzed using qualitative methods. While the calculation method used in this study is the method of job order costing or the cost of the order. The results of the study found that the calculation of the cost of production of type 2 M CA storefront was IDR 1,300,000 with a set profit rate of 19.6% with a selling price of IDR 1,550,000, while the calculation using the job order costing method was equal to Rp 1,329,217 with a selling price of Rp 1,589,744 with a profit rate of 19.6%. Based on the results of his analysis, the difference in the calculation of cost of goods manufactured is due to the fact that Maju Jaya Aluminum does not identify in detail the elements of the cost of production, so the cost of production calculated by Maju Jaya Aluminum is lower than using the job order costing method. We recommend that Maju Jaya Aluminum correct the calculation of cost of goods manufactured according to the job order costing method by calculating and identifying raw material costs, direct labor costs, and factory head costs so that the specified selling price can be accurate and increase.
本研究的目的是通过使用工作订单成本法计算生产成本原理来比较Forward Jaya铝业已应用的2M CA类型店面生产的成本。数据是通过观察、访谈和记录来收集的。此外,采用定性方法对数据进行了分析。而本研究使用的计算方法是作业订单成本法或订单成本法。研究结果发现,计算2型M CA店面的生产成本为1,300,000印尼盾,设定利润率为19.6%,销售价格为1,550,000印尼盾,而使用工作订单成本法计算的生产成本等于Rp 1,329,217,销售价格为Rp 1,589,744,利润率为19.6%。根据他的分析结果,制造产品成本计算的差异是由于玛居查亚铝业没有详细确定生产成本的要素,因此玛居查亚铝业计算的生产成本低于使用工作订单成本法。我们建议Maju Jaya Aluminum通过计算和确定原材料成本、直接人工成本和工厂负责人成本,根据工单成本法正确计算制造的货物成本,使指定的销售价格准确并增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书