{"title":"Litigating Sustainability – Towards a Taxonomy of Counter Corporate Litigation","authors":"Mark B. Taylor","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3627580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper sets out to establish a basis for research into the role of litigation involving business entities as part of the larger project of regulating business activity for sustainability. The paper frames the wave of climate litigation against companies in domestic courts alongside the expanding practice of domestic legal actions against business alleging human rights abuses. Drawing on case law databases, the paper develops a taxonomy of litigation involving business entities, across fields of litigation normally fragmented by legal regime and jurisdiction. Based on the substance of these cases, the paper identifies four broad categories of litigation – biosphere violations, eco-human toxicity, predation, and corporate lawfare – and describes the main dimensions in each category. The substance of these cases reflect attempts to enforce legal standards of sustainability against business entities or, in the case of corporate lawfare, to challenge attempts to corporate accountability for their impacts on people and the planet. The paper suggests that by framing the substance of these cases as part of a set of cases involving business entities, we may better understand the place of litigation in general, and counter corporate litigation in particular, as a legal tool in the development of regulation designed to secure sustainability. The paper is a result of research conducted as part of the project Sustainable Market Actors and Responsible Trade (SMART, EU Horizon 2020) Faculty of Law, University of Oslo.","PeriodicalId":413025,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Compliance (Topic)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Compliance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3627580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The paper sets out to establish a basis for research into the role of litigation involving business entities as part of the larger project of regulating business activity for sustainability. The paper frames the wave of climate litigation against companies in domestic courts alongside the expanding practice of domestic legal actions against business alleging human rights abuses. Drawing on case law databases, the paper develops a taxonomy of litigation involving business entities, across fields of litigation normally fragmented by legal regime and jurisdiction. Based on the substance of these cases, the paper identifies four broad categories of litigation – biosphere violations, eco-human toxicity, predation, and corporate lawfare – and describes the main dimensions in each category. The substance of these cases reflect attempts to enforce legal standards of sustainability against business entities or, in the case of corporate lawfare, to challenge attempts to corporate accountability for their impacts on people and the planet. The paper suggests that by framing the substance of these cases as part of a set of cases involving business entities, we may better understand the place of litigation in general, and counter corporate litigation in particular, as a legal tool in the development of regulation designed to secure sustainability. The paper is a result of research conducted as part of the project Sustainable Market Actors and Responsible Trade (SMART, EU Horizon 2020) Faculty of Law, University of Oslo.
该文件旨在为研究涉及商业实体的诉讼的作用奠定基础,作为规范商业活动以促进可持续性的更大项目的一部分。该文件概述了在国内法院针对企业的气候诉讼浪潮,以及针对指控侵犯人权的企业采取国内法律行动的日益扩大的做法。利用判例法数据库,本文开发了涉及商业实体的诉讼分类学,涵盖了通常由法律制度和管辖权分散的诉讼领域。基于这些案件的实质,本文确定了四大类诉讼——生物圈侵权、生态人类毒性、掠夺和公司诉讼——并描述了每一类中的主要维度。这些案件的实质反映了对商业实体执行可持续性法律标准的企图,或者在公司法律战的情况下,挑战公司对其对人类和地球的影响负责的企图。本文建议,通过将这些案件的实质内容作为涉及商业实体的一系列案件的一部分,我们可以更好地理解诉讼的地位,特别是反公司诉讼,作为制定旨在确保可持续性的监管的法律工具。该论文是奥斯陆大学法学院可持续市场参与者和负责任贸易项目(SMART, EU Horizon 2020)的研究成果。