Traumatic Cranial Dural Venous Sinus Injury

Khawand Saeed Perdawd
{"title":"Traumatic Cranial Dural Venous Sinus Injury","authors":"Khawand Saeed Perdawd","doi":"10.47941/ijhmnp.1388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The study's objective is to elucidate and discuss the causes of traumatic dural venous sinus injury and make comparisons between these causes. The aim is also to assess the susceptibility of dural sinuses to injury in descending orders. Additionally, the research examines the relationship between types of fracture and the challenges in controlling bleeding in patients with traumatic dural venous sinus injury. Furthermore, the study analyzes the factors that influence the morbidity and mortality rate among patients with traumatic dural venous sinus injury.\nMethodology: Between January 2021 and October 2022, a prospective study was carried out, involving 22 patients diagnosed with dural venous sinus injury. The study encompassed both surgically and conservatively treated patients. For each participant, demographic information, such as age, sex, causative trauma, preoperative GCS, preoperative deficit, image findings, name, and part of the injured sinus, as well as the presence and absence of a fracture and its relation to the sinus were recorded. The intraoperative method employed to control bleeding and the amount of blood transfusion were also documented, along with postoperative GCS and postoperative complications. The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score was utilized to assess the neurological outcome.\nFindings: The most frequently injured dural venous sinus was the superior sagittal sinus, accounting for 77.3% of cases (8).Among patients with a linear skull fracture crossing the venous sinus, 83.3% had bleeding that could be easily controlled by placing Gelfoam over the injured sinus . However, in patients with a skull fracture parallel to the sinus over the venous sinus and those with depressed fractures (with/without penetration), we encountered greater difficulty in controlling bleeding (14). Only 16.7% and 10% of these cases, respectively, were easily controlled by placing Gelfoam over the injured sinus, necessitating additional techniques to control bleeding in the remaining patients. Out of the total patients, 20 were managed surgically, while two were managed conservatively due to a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 3 and signs of brain death.\nUnique Contributions to Theory, Policy and Practice: The superior sagittal sinus was identified as the most commonly injured sinus. Road traffic accidents (RTAs) accounted for the most frequent cause of dural sinus injury, representing 40.9% of cases. Bleeding control proved more challenging when dealing with linear fractures parallel to the sinus or depressed (and/or penetrating) fractures over the sinus, compared to linear fractures crossing the sinus. The most significant factor influencing the mortality rate was the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score on admission. Mortality and morbidity rates were highest in cases involving injury to the posterior part of the superior sagittal sinus, sigmoid sinuses, and combined injury to the anterior and middle parts of the superior sagittal sinus. Furthermore, the mortality rate was notably higher among military-injured patients than civilian-injured patients\n ","PeriodicalId":441176,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing Practice","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47941/ijhmnp.1388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The study's objective is to elucidate and discuss the causes of traumatic dural venous sinus injury and make comparisons between these causes. The aim is also to assess the susceptibility of dural sinuses to injury in descending orders. Additionally, the research examines the relationship between types of fracture and the challenges in controlling bleeding in patients with traumatic dural venous sinus injury. Furthermore, the study analyzes the factors that influence the morbidity and mortality rate among patients with traumatic dural venous sinus injury. Methodology: Between January 2021 and October 2022, a prospective study was carried out, involving 22 patients diagnosed with dural venous sinus injury. The study encompassed both surgically and conservatively treated patients. For each participant, demographic information, such as age, sex, causative trauma, preoperative GCS, preoperative deficit, image findings, name, and part of the injured sinus, as well as the presence and absence of a fracture and its relation to the sinus were recorded. The intraoperative method employed to control bleeding and the amount of blood transfusion were also documented, along with postoperative GCS and postoperative complications. The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score was utilized to assess the neurological outcome. Findings: The most frequently injured dural venous sinus was the superior sagittal sinus, accounting for 77.3% of cases (8).Among patients with a linear skull fracture crossing the venous sinus, 83.3% had bleeding that could be easily controlled by placing Gelfoam over the injured sinus . However, in patients with a skull fracture parallel to the sinus over the venous sinus and those with depressed fractures (with/without penetration), we encountered greater difficulty in controlling bleeding (14). Only 16.7% and 10% of these cases, respectively, were easily controlled by placing Gelfoam over the injured sinus, necessitating additional techniques to control bleeding in the remaining patients. Out of the total patients, 20 were managed surgically, while two were managed conservatively due to a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 3 and signs of brain death. Unique Contributions to Theory, Policy and Practice: The superior sagittal sinus was identified as the most commonly injured sinus. Road traffic accidents (RTAs) accounted for the most frequent cause of dural sinus injury, representing 40.9% of cases. Bleeding control proved more challenging when dealing with linear fractures parallel to the sinus or depressed (and/or penetrating) fractures over the sinus, compared to linear fractures crossing the sinus. The most significant factor influencing the mortality rate was the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score on admission. Mortality and morbidity rates were highest in cases involving injury to the posterior part of the superior sagittal sinus, sigmoid sinuses, and combined injury to the anterior and middle parts of the superior sagittal sinus. Furthermore, the mortality rate was notably higher among military-injured patients than civilian-injured patients  
外伤性颅硬脑膜静脉窦损伤
目的:探讨外伤性硬脑膜静脉窦损伤的原因,并进行比较。目的还在于评估硬脑膜窦对损伤的敏感性。此外,本研究探讨了创伤性硬脑膜静脉窦损伤患者骨折类型与控制出血的关系。分析外伤性硬膜静脉窦损伤患者发病率和死亡率的影响因素。方法:在2021年1月至2022年10月期间,进行了一项前瞻性研究,涉及22名诊断为硬膜静脉窦损伤的患者。该研究包括手术和保守治疗的患者。记录每位参与者的人口统计信息,如年龄、性别、外伤原因、术前GCS、术前缺陷、影像学表现、姓名、受伤部位、骨折是否存在及其与窦的关系。记录术中控制出血的方法和输血量,以及术后GCS和术后并发症。格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分用于评估神经系统预后。结果:硬脑膜静脉窦损伤最多的部位是上矢状窦,占77.3%(8)。在穿过静脉窦的直线颅骨骨折患者中,83.3%的患者出血,在损伤的静脉窦上放置明胶泡沫可以很容易地控制出血。然而,在与静脉窦平行的颅骨骨折患者和凹陷性骨折患者(有/没有穿透)中,我们在控制出血方面遇到了更大的困难(14)。在这些病例中,分别只有16.7%和10%的患者可以通过在受伤的鼻窦上放置明胶泡沫来控制出血,其余患者需要额外的技术来控制出血。在所有患者中,20人接受手术治疗,2人因格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)为3分和脑死亡迹象而接受保守治疗。对理论、政策和实践的独特贡献:上矢状窦是最常见的损伤窦。道路交通事故(rta)是造成硬脑膜窦损伤最常见的原因,占40.9%。与穿过鼻窦的线性骨折相比,与鼻窦平行的线性骨折或鼻窦上方凹陷(和/或穿透)骨折的出血控制更具挑战性。影响死亡率的最重要因素是入院时的格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)。损伤上矢状窦后部、乙状窦以及上矢状窦前部和中部复合损伤的病例死亡率和发病率最高。此外,军人伤病员的死亡率明显高于平民伤病员
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信