Comparison of Method Chunks and Method Fragments for Situational Method Engineering

B. Henderson-Sellers, Cesar Gonzalez-Perez, J. Ralyté
{"title":"Comparison of Method Chunks and Method Fragments for Situational Method Engineering","authors":"B. Henderson-Sellers, Cesar Gonzalez-Perez, J. Ralyté","doi":"10.1109/ASWEC.2008.67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two main candidates for the atomic element to be used in situational method engineering (SME) have been proposed: the \"method fragment\" and the \"method chunk\". These are examined here in terms of their conceptual integrity and in terms of how they may be used in method construction. Also, parallels are drawn between the two approaches. Secondly, the idea of differentiating an interface from a body has been proposed for method chunks (but not for method fragments). This idea is examined and mappings are constructed between the interface and body concepts of method chunks and the concepts used to describe method fragments. The new ISO/IEC 24744 standard metamodel is used as a conceptual framework to perform these mappings.","PeriodicalId":231903,"journal":{"name":"19th Australian Conference on Software Engineering (aswec 2008)","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"54","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"19th Australian Conference on Software Engineering (aswec 2008)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASWEC.2008.67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

Abstract

Two main candidates for the atomic element to be used in situational method engineering (SME) have been proposed: the "method fragment" and the "method chunk". These are examined here in terms of their conceptual integrity and in terms of how they may be used in method construction. Also, parallels are drawn between the two approaches. Secondly, the idea of differentiating an interface from a body has been proposed for method chunks (but not for method fragments). This idea is examined and mappings are constructed between the interface and body concepts of method chunks and the concepts used to describe method fragments. The new ISO/IEC 24744 standard metamodel is used as a conceptual framework to perform these mappings.
情境方法工程中方法块与方法片段的比较
在情景方法工程(SME)中使用的原子元素的两个主要候选已经被提出:“方法片段”和“方法块”。这里根据它们的概念完整性和如何在方法构建中使用它们来检查它们。此外,这两种方法之间也有相似之处。其次,对于方法块(而不是方法片段),已经提出了将接口与主体区分开来的想法。研究了这一思想,并在方法块的接口和主体概念与用于描述方法片段的概念之间构建了映射。新的ISO/IEC 24744标准元模型被用作执行这些映射的概念框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信