{"title":"Pitch extraction algorithm for voice recognition applications","authors":"R. Sankar","doi":"10.1109/SSST.1988.17080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two computationally simple pitch-extraction algorithms based on the autocorrelation method of pitch determination are presented. Both algorithms have been implemented in software, and their performance has been evaluated. The first pitch-extraction algorithm (PEA Hash 1) uses center clipping and infinite peak dipping for time-domain preprocessing before computing autocorrelation while the second algorithm (PEA Hash 2) nonlinearly distorts the speech signal before center clipping and autocorrelation computation. PEA Hash 2 provides a better pitch detection estimate than PEA Hash 1 and also eliminates the need to adjust critically the clipping level threshold. The initial results obtained by comparing the average gross pitch error rate suggest that PEA Hash 2 is better (by a factor of two or more) than PEA Hash 1.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":345412,"journal":{"name":"[1988] Proceedings. The Twentieth Southeastern Symposium on System Theory","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1988] Proceedings. The Twentieth Southeastern Symposium on System Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SSST.1988.17080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
Two computationally simple pitch-extraction algorithms based on the autocorrelation method of pitch determination are presented. Both algorithms have been implemented in software, and their performance has been evaluated. The first pitch-extraction algorithm (PEA Hash 1) uses center clipping and infinite peak dipping for time-domain preprocessing before computing autocorrelation while the second algorithm (PEA Hash 2) nonlinearly distorts the speech signal before center clipping and autocorrelation computation. PEA Hash 2 provides a better pitch detection estimate than PEA Hash 1 and also eliminates the need to adjust critically the clipping level threshold. The initial results obtained by comparing the average gross pitch error rate suggest that PEA Hash 2 is better (by a factor of two or more) than PEA Hash 1.<>