Here Comes the Sun: Solar Power Parity With Fossil Fuels

Nathan Mee, M. Miller
{"title":"Here Comes the Sun: Solar Power Parity With Fossil Fuels","authors":"Nathan Mee, M. Miller","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1650692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is wide agreement across the political spectrum that the United States should develop domestic, renewable sources of energy. There are many ways to describe the challenges of a transition from a fossil fuel economy to one fueled by atoms, the sun, or the wind, but in a nutshell, the problem is said to be cost: the basic reason the United States continues overwhelmingly to rely on fossil fuels is that they are comparatively cheap, and alternative energy is relatively expensive. Or so it seems. This Article is intended to encourage more open discussion about real energy costs. To keep the discussion short and focused, we concentrate on solar energy. We look at solar energy through the lens of some simple and conservative assumptions about the cost of one input — water, and the cost of one externality — carbon. Our goal is to illustrate the kind of analysis that would move public discussion and policies towards “truer” energy cost assessments. The bottom line: fundamental shifts in energy sources from fossil fuels (or at least coal and oil) to large-scale commercial solar may be closer than suggested by headlines and widely held popular and political beliefs.","PeriodicalId":388507,"journal":{"name":"Energy Law & Policy eJournal","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Law & Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1650692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There is wide agreement across the political spectrum that the United States should develop domestic, renewable sources of energy. There are many ways to describe the challenges of a transition from a fossil fuel economy to one fueled by atoms, the sun, or the wind, but in a nutshell, the problem is said to be cost: the basic reason the United States continues overwhelmingly to rely on fossil fuels is that they are comparatively cheap, and alternative energy is relatively expensive. Or so it seems. This Article is intended to encourage more open discussion about real energy costs. To keep the discussion short and focused, we concentrate on solar energy. We look at solar energy through the lens of some simple and conservative assumptions about the cost of one input — water, and the cost of one externality — carbon. Our goal is to illustrate the kind of analysis that would move public discussion and policies towards “truer” energy cost assessments. The bottom line: fundamental shifts in energy sources from fossil fuels (or at least coal and oil) to large-scale commercial solar may be closer than suggested by headlines and widely held popular and political beliefs.
太阳来了:太阳能与化石燃料平价
美国政界普遍认为,美国应该发展国内可再生能源。从化石燃料经济向由原子、太阳能或风能驱动的经济过渡所面临的挑战有很多,但简而言之,问题在于成本:美国继续压倒性地依赖化石燃料的基本原因是它们相对便宜,而替代能源相对昂贵。至少看起来是这样。本文旨在鼓励对实际能源成本进行更公开的讨论。为了使讨论简短而集中,我们集中讨论太阳能。我们通过一些简单而保守的假设来看待太阳能,这些假设是关于一种投入成本——水的成本,以及一种外部性成本——碳的成本。我们的目标是阐明这种分析,这种分析将推动公众讨论和政策朝着“更真实”的能源成本评估方向发展。底线是:能源从化石燃料(或至少是煤炭和石油)向大规模商业太阳能的根本性转变,可能比头条新闻和广泛持有的大众和政治信念所暗示的更接近。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信