Excessive Length of Pretrial Detention in the Light of Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights

Urszula Szafrańska
{"title":"Excessive Length of Pretrial Detention in the Light of Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights","authors":"Urszula Szafrańska","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.9891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the problem of applying pre-trial detention by Polish courts since Poland has become a member state of the Council of Europe. The author aims to present the standards of the European Court of Human Right’s jurisprudence in this respect, and at the same time to highlight the most frequent mistakes in the jurisprudence of national courts, which result in finding of a violation of Article 5(3) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The author’s intention is to show, using a historical method, that the institution of pre-trial detention was abused by Polish courts in previous years, however, it has improved now due to, among other things, the influence of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights on the process of establishing and applying the law in Poland in the field of pre-trial detention over the past 29 years.\n\n","PeriodicalId":403517,"journal":{"name":"Kwartalnik Prawa Międzynarodowego","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kwartalnik Prawa Międzynarodowego","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.9891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem of applying pre-trial detention by Polish courts since Poland has become a member state of the Council of Europe. The author aims to present the standards of the European Court of Human Right’s jurisprudence in this respect, and at the same time to highlight the most frequent mistakes in the jurisprudence of national courts, which result in finding of a violation of Article 5(3) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The author’s intention is to show, using a historical method, that the institution of pre-trial detention was abused by Polish courts in previous years, however, it has improved now due to, among other things, the influence of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights on the process of establishing and applying the law in Poland in the field of pre-trial detention over the past 29 years.
从欧洲人权法院判例看审前羁押过长
这篇文章专门讨论波兰法院自波兰成为欧洲委员会成员国以来适用审前拘留的问题。作者旨在介绍欧洲人权法院在这方面的判例标准,同时强调各国法院判例中最常见的错误,这些错误导致了对违反《保护人权和基本自由公约》第5条第3款的判决。提交人的意图是用一种历史方法表明,波兰法院在前几年滥用审前拘留制度,但是,由于欧洲人权法院的判决对波兰在过去29年中在审前拘留领域制定和适用法律的进程产生了影响,审前拘留制度现在有所改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信