Empirical Evaluation of Three Wind Analysis Tools for Concept Design of an Urban Wind Shelter

Rafael Moya
{"title":"Empirical Evaluation of Three Wind Analysis Tools for Concept Design of an Urban Wind Shelter","authors":"Rafael Moya","doi":"10.52842/conf.caadria.2015.313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the performance of three wind analysis programs used in the early design stage (EDS) of a passive windbreak shelter concept for an urban context. This study compared the different workflows of these programs and the respective visualized results, identifying the differences and limitations of these tools, for design exploration. The programs tested were Autodesk Vasari, ODS-Studio, and ANSYS CFX. The results of this investigation indicate that basic computational fluid dynamics (CFD) programs such as Vasari was found to be more suitable for the observation of large-scale wind phenomena through the whole area of the shelter. Moreover, intermediate CFD tools (functions, usability) such as ODS-Studio can be used more efficiently in detailed visualization of wind interacting with design features. Finally, a more sophisticated CFD program like ANSYS CFX can be incorporated in the early design stage workflow for final verification of results.","PeriodicalId":191179,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2015.313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the performance of three wind analysis programs used in the early design stage (EDS) of a passive windbreak shelter concept for an urban context. This study compared the different workflows of these programs and the respective visualized results, identifying the differences and limitations of these tools, for design exploration. The programs tested were Autodesk Vasari, ODS-Studio, and ANSYS CFX. The results of this investigation indicate that basic computational fluid dynamics (CFD) programs such as Vasari was found to be more suitable for the observation of large-scale wind phenomena through the whole area of the shelter. Moreover, intermediate CFD tools (functions, usability) such as ODS-Studio can be used more efficiently in detailed visualization of wind interacting with design features. Finally, a more sophisticated CFD program like ANSYS CFX can be incorporated in the early design stage workflow for final verification of results.
城市风挡概念设计中三种风分析工具的实证评价
本研究的目的是评估在城市环境中被动式防风林概念的早期设计阶段(EDS)中使用的三种风分析程序的性能。本研究比较了这些程序的不同工作流程和各自的可视化结果,确定了这些工具的差异和局限性,以进行设计探索。测试的程序是Autodesk Vasari、ODS-Studio和ANSYS CFX。研究结果表明,基础计算流体动力学(CFD)程序(如Vasari)更适合于观测整个掩体区域的大规模风现象。此外,ODS-Studio等中间CFD工具(功能、可用性)可以更有效地用于风与设计特征交互的详细可视化。最后,可以将更复杂的CFD程序(如ANSYS CFX)集成到早期设计阶段的工作流程中,以便对结果进行最终验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信