Plantation Forestry in South Africa and its Impact on Biodiversity and Water

R. Pott
{"title":"Plantation Forestry in South Africa and its Impact on Biodiversity and Water","authors":"R. Pott","doi":"10.1080/10295925.1997.9631167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SYNOPSIS It is apparent that much of the criticism of plantation forestry as a form of land-use is based on emotional bias rather than on hard evidence. The results of a perception survey are presented to support this supposition. Two accusations that are commonly levelled against forestry—namely that it leads to a serious reduction in biodiversity, and secondly that it uses a disproportionate amount of water—are debated and more reasoned views are presented. The need for research and monitoring to provide the factual evidence that decision makers need for the wise management of land-use options—including forestry—is highlighted.","PeriodicalId":228456,"journal":{"name":"The Southern African Forestry Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Southern African Forestry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10295925.1997.9631167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

SYNOPSIS It is apparent that much of the criticism of plantation forestry as a form of land-use is based on emotional bias rather than on hard evidence. The results of a perception survey are presented to support this supposition. Two accusations that are commonly levelled against forestry—namely that it leads to a serious reduction in biodiversity, and secondly that it uses a disproportionate amount of water—are debated and more reasoned views are presented. The need for research and monitoring to provide the factual evidence that decision makers need for the wise management of land-use options—including forestry—is highlighted.
南非人工林及其对生物多样性和水资源的影响
很明显,许多对人工林作为一种土地利用形式的批评是基于情感偏见,而不是基于确凿的证据。一项认知调查的结果被提出来支持这一假设。针对林业的两项普遍指控——一是林业导致生物多样性严重减少,二是林业消耗了不成比例的水资源——经过了辩论,并提出了更合理的观点。报告强调需要进行研究和监测,以提供决策者明智地管理土地利用选择(包括林业)所需的事实证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信