A review of scanning methods and control implications for scanning probe microscopy

Y. R. Teo, Y. Yong, A. Fleming
{"title":"A review of scanning methods and control implications for scanning probe microscopy","authors":"Y. R. Teo, Y. Yong, A. Fleming","doi":"10.1109/ACC.2016.7526837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a scanning probe microscope (SPM), the image is obtained by scanning a sample relative to a physical probe which captures the topography. The conventional scanning method is a raster pattern where a triangular or sawtooth waveform is applied to the x-axis while the y-axis position is incremented. In recent years the need for higher imaging speeds has motivated the investigation of novel scanning trajectories such as spiral, cycloid, and Lissajous patterns. Although the benefits of these approaches has been described in the literature, the lack of a comprehensive comparison makes the actual performance gains, if any, unclear. This article evaluates the efficacy of current scanning methods by comparing the required scan rate, signal bandwidth, sampling frequency, and probe velocity. In addition, the control implications of each method are also discussed qualitatively. Based on the prescribed performance metrics, the sinusoidal raster method significantly outperforms the raster, spiral, and Lissajous methods whilst being the simplest to implement. Therefore, it is concluded that the most suitable currently known method for high-speed or video-rate AFM imaging is sinusoidal raster scanning.","PeriodicalId":137983,"journal":{"name":"2016 American Control Conference (ACC)","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 American Control Conference (ACC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2016.7526837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

In a scanning probe microscope (SPM), the image is obtained by scanning a sample relative to a physical probe which captures the topography. The conventional scanning method is a raster pattern where a triangular or sawtooth waveform is applied to the x-axis while the y-axis position is incremented. In recent years the need for higher imaging speeds has motivated the investigation of novel scanning trajectories such as spiral, cycloid, and Lissajous patterns. Although the benefits of these approaches has been described in the literature, the lack of a comprehensive comparison makes the actual performance gains, if any, unclear. This article evaluates the efficacy of current scanning methods by comparing the required scan rate, signal bandwidth, sampling frequency, and probe velocity. In addition, the control implications of each method are also discussed qualitatively. Based on the prescribed performance metrics, the sinusoidal raster method significantly outperforms the raster, spiral, and Lissajous methods whilst being the simplest to implement. Therefore, it is concluded that the most suitable currently known method for high-speed or video-rate AFM imaging is sinusoidal raster scanning.
扫描探针显微镜的扫描方法及其控制意义的综述
在扫描探针显微镜(SPM)中,通过相对于捕获地形的物理探针扫描样品来获得图像。传统的扫描方法是栅格模式,其中三角形或锯齿形波形应用于x轴,同时y轴位置递增。近年来,对更高成像速度的需求推动了对新型扫描轨迹的研究,如螺旋、摆线和利萨焦模式。尽管这些方法的好处已经在文献中有所描述,但由于缺乏全面的比较,使得实际的性能收益(如果有的话)不清楚。本文通过比较所需的扫描速率、信号带宽、采样频率和探头速度来评估当前扫描方法的有效性。此外,还定性地讨论了每种方法的控制含义。基于规定的性能指标,正弦光栅方法明显优于光栅、螺旋和Lissajous方法,同时是最简单的实现方法。因此,我们得出结论,目前已知的最适合高速或视频速率AFM成像的方法是正弦光栅扫描。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信