The Application of Fuzzy Inference System during Risk Assesment Process Study Case: 14” Subsea Pipeline PT. PHE-WMO

B. Santoso, K. Artana, R. O. S. Gurning, A. Dinariyana
{"title":"The Application of Fuzzy Inference System during Risk Assesment Process Study Case: 14” Subsea Pipeline PT. PHE-WMO","authors":"B. Santoso, K. Artana, R. O. S. Gurning, A. Dinariyana","doi":"10.23977/mastic.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Potential hazard that could lead to the failure of the operations of gas pipelines 14 \"PT PHE-WMO is often found in the offshore and onshore area. In order to prevent potential damage, the companies need to conduct risk assessment. This study compares the risk assessment approach between Muhlbauer and Fuzzy Inference System to get a proper risk assessment for gas pipelines 14\" PT. PHE-WMO. Muhlbauer scoring system used in this approach i.e. third party damage index, corrosion index, design index, incorrect operation index, and leak impact factor. On the other hand, Fuzzy Inference System approach applied in the scoring system is Mamdani method (Max-Min) that includes the formation of fuzzy set, the implications of the application functions, composition rules, and defuzzyfication. The comparative results of both RSS approach are used as consideration to determine the next appropriate mitigation step for gas pipe 14 \"PT PHE-WMO. The calculation of pipe using fuzzy approaches provides greater difference value in RRs. The greater difference value of RRS makes it easy and clear in administering the rank for each segment of data input. Thus, the fuzzy method is more accurate and precise than the Muhlbauer.","PeriodicalId":200338,"journal":{"name":"Maritime Safety International Conference (MASTIC 2018)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maritime Safety International Conference (MASTIC 2018)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23977/mastic.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Potential hazard that could lead to the failure of the operations of gas pipelines 14 "PT PHE-WMO is often found in the offshore and onshore area. In order to prevent potential damage, the companies need to conduct risk assessment. This study compares the risk assessment approach between Muhlbauer and Fuzzy Inference System to get a proper risk assessment for gas pipelines 14" PT. PHE-WMO. Muhlbauer scoring system used in this approach i.e. third party damage index, corrosion index, design index, incorrect operation index, and leak impact factor. On the other hand, Fuzzy Inference System approach applied in the scoring system is Mamdani method (Max-Min) that includes the formation of fuzzy set, the implications of the application functions, composition rules, and defuzzyfication. The comparative results of both RSS approach are used as consideration to determine the next appropriate mitigation step for gas pipe 14 "PT PHE-WMO. The calculation of pipe using fuzzy approaches provides greater difference value in RRs. The greater difference value of RRS makes it easy and clear in administering the rank for each segment of data input. Thus, the fuzzy method is more accurate and precise than the Muhlbauer.
模糊推理系统在风险评估过程中的应用——以14 "海底管道PT. PHE-WMO
:可能导致14英寸PT PHE-WMO天然气管道运行失败的潜在危险经常出现在海上和陆上地区。为了防止潜在的损害,公司需要进行风险评估。通过对Muhlbauer法和模糊推理法的风险评价方法进行比较,得出了适合于14”PT. PHE-WMO输气管道的风险评价方法。在这种方法中使用的Muhlbauer评分系统,即第三方损坏指数、腐蚀指数、设计指数、不正确操作指数和泄漏影响因子。另一方面,在评分系统中应用的模糊推理系统方法是Mamdani方法(Max-Min),该方法包括模糊集的形成、应用函数的含义、组合规则和去模糊化。两种RSS方法的比较结果被用作确定14 "PT PHE-WMO燃气管道下一个适当的缓解步骤的考虑因素。采用模糊方法计算管道,可获得较大的rr差值。RRS的较大差值使得对每段数据输入的排序管理变得简单明了。因此,模糊方法比Muhlbauer方法更准确、更精确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信