Clinical behavior of children with infantile cerebral palsy after ozone therapy.

Benjamin E. Arenas, J. L. Calunga, Silvia Menéndez-Cepero, C. Vera, M. Infante, M. Herrera, O. Franco, A. Gorzelewski
{"title":"Clinical behavior of children with infantile cerebral palsy after ozone therapy.","authors":"Benjamin E. Arenas, J. L. Calunga, Silvia Menéndez-Cepero, C. Vera, M. Infante, M. Herrera, O. Franco, A. Gorzelewski","doi":"10.7203/JO3T.2.3.2018.11205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. The aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of ozone therapy in the treatment of Infantile Cerebral Palsy (ICP). Patients and methods. A non-controlled clinical assay was made in the Ozone Research Center (CIO), Havana, Cuba from January 2013 to January 2014. The sample was constituted by patients remitted to pediatrics consultation of CIO, to whom inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. The study group involved 45 patients, from 1 month of birth to 8 years, with cerebral palsy of hypoxic-ischemic cause. The evaluation criteria were: evolution of the motor disorder according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) scale, modification of muscle tone (Ashworth modified scale) and response to treatment (O’Brien modified scale). The way of administration was rectal insufflation; concentrations between 15, 20, 25 and 30 mg/L were used, volumes varied according to age, making calculation of the dose of ozone according to kilograms of weight. Cycles of 20 sessions, every 3 months were indicated, until completing 4 in 16 months. Patients were clinically evaluated, according to the scales used, before and after each cycle. Results and Discussion. The best answer to treatment was obtained in the group aged ? 4 years. The variables analyzed showed a significant improvement when the ozone treatment concluded. With respect to the evolution of the motor disorder, in 65 % of cases it improved. In the group of children below 4 years, the response was better in relation to the muscle tone. Response to treatment, according to the relatives’ criteria, was of 70 % of the children with marked improvement in the tone and muscle function. Conclusions. The greatest percentage of patients improved in the evolution of the motor disorder; when the Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) scale was applied, more than half the patients showed an improvement. A high percentage of children get a satisfactory result regarding muscle tone and motor function. No side effects were present in any of the cases during the study.","PeriodicalId":137241,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ozone Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ozone Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7203/JO3T.2.3.2018.11205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. The aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of ozone therapy in the treatment of Infantile Cerebral Palsy (ICP). Patients and methods. A non-controlled clinical assay was made in the Ozone Research Center (CIO), Havana, Cuba from January 2013 to January 2014. The sample was constituted by patients remitted to pediatrics consultation of CIO, to whom inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. The study group involved 45 patients, from 1 month of birth to 8 years, with cerebral palsy of hypoxic-ischemic cause. The evaluation criteria were: evolution of the motor disorder according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) scale, modification of muscle tone (Ashworth modified scale) and response to treatment (O’Brien modified scale). The way of administration was rectal insufflation; concentrations between 15, 20, 25 and 30 mg/L were used, volumes varied according to age, making calculation of the dose of ozone according to kilograms of weight. Cycles of 20 sessions, every 3 months were indicated, until completing 4 in 16 months. Patients were clinically evaluated, according to the scales used, before and after each cycle. Results and Discussion. The best answer to treatment was obtained in the group aged ? 4 years. The variables analyzed showed a significant improvement when the ozone treatment concluded. With respect to the evolution of the motor disorder, in 65 % of cases it improved. In the group of children below 4 years, the response was better in relation to the muscle tone. Response to treatment, according to the relatives’ criteria, was of 70 % of the children with marked improvement in the tone and muscle function. Conclusions. The greatest percentage of patients improved in the evolution of the motor disorder; when the Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) scale was applied, more than half the patients showed an improvement. A high percentage of children get a satisfactory result regarding muscle tone and motor function. No side effects were present in any of the cases during the study.
小儿脑瘫臭氧治疗后的临床行为。
目标。本研究的目的是确定臭氧疗法在治疗小儿脑瘫(ICP)中的有效性。患者和方法。2013年1月至2014年1月在古巴哈瓦那臭氧研究中心(CIO)进行了非对照临床测定。样本由寄往CIO儿科会诊的患者组成,采用纳入和排除标准。研究组纳入45例新生儿1个月至8岁的缺氧缺血性脑瘫患者。评定标准为:根据大运动功能分类系统(GMFCS)量表评定运动障碍的演变程度、肌肉张力的改变程度(Ashworth修正量表)和对治疗的反应程度(O 'Brien修正量表)。给药方式为直肠灌胃;浓度在15、20、25和30毫克/升之间,体积随年龄变化,按公斤体重计算臭氧剂量。每3个月进行20次疗程,直到16个月完成4次疗程。根据使用的量表,在每个周期前后对患者进行临床评估。结果和讨论。治疗效果最好的是年龄为?4年。分析的变量表明,当臭氧处理结束时,情况有了显著改善。关于运动障碍的发展,65%的病例有所改善。在4岁以下的儿童组中,与肌肉张力相关的反应更好。根据亲属的标准,70%的儿童对治疗有反应,张力和肌肉功能有明显改善。结论。在运动障碍的演变中,患者改善的比例最大;应用手工能力分类系统(MACS)量表时,半数以上患者表现出改善。很高比例的儿童在肌肉张力和运动功能方面得到满意的结果。在研究期间,没有任何病例出现副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信