SAT: a methodology to assess the social acceptance of innovative AI-based technologies

Carmela Occhipinti, Antonio Carnevale, L. Briguglio, Andrea Iannone, Piercosma Bisconti
{"title":"SAT: a methodology to assess the social acceptance of innovative AI-based technologies","authors":"Carmela Occhipinti, Antonio Carnevale, L. Briguglio, Andrea Iannone, Piercosma Bisconti","doi":"10.1108/jices-09-2021-0095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to present the conceptual model of an innovative methodology (SAT) to assess the social acceptance of technology, especially focusing on artificial intelligence (AI)-based technology.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nAfter a review of the literature, this paper presents the main lines by which SAT stands out from current methods, namely, a four-bubble approach and a mix of qualitative and quantitative techniques that offer assessments that look at technology as a socio-technical system. Each bubble determines the social variability of a cluster of values: User-Experience Acceptance, Social Disruptiveness, Value Impact and Trust.\n\n\nFindings\nThe methodology is still in development, requiring further developments, specifications and validation. Accordingly, the findings of this paper refer to the realm of the research discussion, that is, highlighting the importance of preventively assessing and forecasting the acceptance of technology and building the best design strategies to boost sustainable and ethical technology adoption.\n\n\nSocial implications\nOnce SAT method will be validated, it could constitute a useful tool, with societal implications, for helping users, markets and institutions to appraise and determine the co-implications of technology and socio-cultural contexts.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nNew AI applications flood today’s users and markets, often without a clear understanding of risks and impacts. In the European context, regulations (EU AI Act) and rules (EU Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy) try to fill this normative gap. The SAT method seeks to integrate the risk-based assessment of AI with an assessment of the perceptive-psychological and socio-behavioural aspects of its social acceptability.\n","PeriodicalId":156416,"journal":{"name":"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jices-09-2021-0095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present the conceptual model of an innovative methodology (SAT) to assess the social acceptance of technology, especially focusing on artificial intelligence (AI)-based technology. Design/methodology/approach After a review of the literature, this paper presents the main lines by which SAT stands out from current methods, namely, a four-bubble approach and a mix of qualitative and quantitative techniques that offer assessments that look at technology as a socio-technical system. Each bubble determines the social variability of a cluster of values: User-Experience Acceptance, Social Disruptiveness, Value Impact and Trust. Findings The methodology is still in development, requiring further developments, specifications and validation. Accordingly, the findings of this paper refer to the realm of the research discussion, that is, highlighting the importance of preventively assessing and forecasting the acceptance of technology and building the best design strategies to boost sustainable and ethical technology adoption. Social implications Once SAT method will be validated, it could constitute a useful tool, with societal implications, for helping users, markets and institutions to appraise and determine the co-implications of technology and socio-cultural contexts. Originality/value New AI applications flood today’s users and markets, often without a clear understanding of risks and impacts. In the European context, regulations (EU AI Act) and rules (EU Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy) try to fill this normative gap. The SAT method seeks to integrate the risk-based assessment of AI with an assessment of the perceptive-psychological and socio-behavioural aspects of its social acceptability.
SAT:一种评估基于人工智能的创新技术的社会接受度的方法
本文的目的是提出一种创新方法(SAT)的概念模型,以评估技术的社会接受度,特别是关注基于人工智能(AI)的技术。在对文献进行回顾之后,本文提出了SAT从当前方法中脱颖而出的主线,即四泡沫方法和定性和定量技术的混合,这些方法提供了将技术视为社会技术系统的评估。每个泡沫决定了一组价值的社会可变性:用户体验接受度、社会破坏性、价值影响和信任。该方法仍在开发中,需要进一步开发、规范和验证。因此,本文的研究结果参考了研究讨论的领域,即强调了预防性评估和预测技术接受度以及建立最佳设计策略以促进可持续和道德技术采用的重要性。社会影响一旦SAT方法得到验证,它可以构成一个有用的工具,具有社会影响,帮助用户、市场和机构评估和确定技术和社会文化背景的共同影响。创新/价值新的人工智能应用充斥着今天的用户和市场,通常没有对风险和影响的清晰理解。在欧洲,法规(欧盟人工智能法案)和规则(欧盟可信赖道德准则)试图填补这一规范空白。SAT方法旨在将基于风险的人工智能评估与对其社会可接受性的感知心理和社会行为方面的评估相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信