Effective and practical risk management options for computerised system validation

R. Mcdowall
{"title":"Effective and practical risk management options for computerised system validation","authors":"R. Mcdowall","doi":"10.1002/QAJ.339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Risk management and risk assessment for computerised systems validation is a key regulatory issue following the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) reassessment of the 21 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Part 11 regulations (Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures final rule). This paper reviews the GXP (i.e. Good Laboratory Practice (GLP), Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP)) regulatory requirements and associated guidance documents and then focuses on the International Standards Organisation (ISO) 14971 risk management process and vocabulary for an overall risk management framework. \n \n \n \nSeveral risk analysis methodologies are presented and assessed for their applicability for computerised system validation (CSV). The conclusion is that one methodology does not fit all situations and the prudent professional should select the best methodology applicable for the problem at hand. Finally, an overall risk management process flow for CSV is presented and discussed based on two questions: ‘Do I need to validate the system?’ and if so, ‘How much work do I need to do?’ A single integrated document is presented as an alternative to a full V-model for the validation of lower risk computer systems. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":147931,"journal":{"name":"Quality Assurance Journal","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Assurance Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/QAJ.339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Risk management and risk assessment for computerised systems validation is a key regulatory issue following the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) reassessment of the 21 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Part 11 regulations (Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures final rule). This paper reviews the GXP (i.e. Good Laboratory Practice (GLP), Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP)) regulatory requirements and associated guidance documents and then focuses on the International Standards Organisation (ISO) 14971 risk management process and vocabulary for an overall risk management framework. Several risk analysis methodologies are presented and assessed for their applicability for computerised system validation (CSV). The conclusion is that one methodology does not fit all situations and the prudent professional should select the best methodology applicable for the problem at hand. Finally, an overall risk management process flow for CSV is presented and discussed based on two questions: ‘Do I need to validate the system?’ and if so, ‘How much work do I need to do?’ A single integrated document is presented as an alternative to a full V-model for the validation of lower risk computer systems. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
计算机化系统验证的有效和实用的风险管理方案
计算机化系统验证的风险管理和风险评估是食品药品监督管理局(FDA)重新评估21联邦法规(CFR)第11部分法规(电子记录和电子签名最终规则)后的关键监管问题。本文回顾了GXP(即良好实验室规范(GLP)、良好临床规范(GCP)和良好生产规范(GMP))的监管要求和相关的指导文件,然后重点介绍了国际标准组织(ISO) 14971风险管理流程和整体风险管理框架的词汇。提出了几种风险分析方法,并评估了它们在计算机化系统验证(CSV)中的适用性。结论是,一种方法不适合所有情况,谨慎的专业人员应该选择适用于手头问题的最佳方法。最后,基于两个问题,提出并讨论了CSV的整体风险管理流程:“我需要验证系统吗?”如果是这样,“我需要做多少工作?”“一个单一的集成文件作为验证低风险计算机系统的完整v模型的替代方案。版权所有©2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信