Accuracy Order of the Acquisition of the English Article System: Evidence from the Written and Oral Production of Undergraduate Arab EFL Learners

Muneera Muftah
{"title":"Accuracy Order of the Acquisition of the English Article System: Evidence from the Written and Oral Production of Undergraduate Arab EFL Learners","authors":"Muneera Muftah","doi":"10.24127/pj.v12i2.7502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study investigates the accuracy order and underlying processes of acquiring English articles by 45 undergraduate Arab EFL learners drawn from three proficiency groups. The theoretical approach adopted here is Bickerton's (1981) semantic model that focuses on the features ±Specific Referent(±SR) and ±Assumed Known to the Hearer (±HK). The study aims to identify what the three measures, SOC (Supplied in Obligatory Contexts), TLU (Target-Like Use), and UOC (Used in Obligatory Contexts), reveal about the accuracy order of the acquisition of English articles in the written and oral production tasks. It also seeks to determine the semantic contexts in which the articles are overgeneralized and the most challenging context to acquire. The results show that the SOC measure reveals an accuracy order of a >the >Ø and the >a >Ø, whereas the TLU measure reveals an accuracy order of the>a>Ø across the groups. In addition, the UOC measure reveals that Ø goes through a flooding-then-trickling process, then experiences a U-shaped behavior highlighted by an overgeneralization stage, and follows the by undergoing a U-shaped development. Furthermore, the learners have difficulty distinguishing [±HK] and [±Countability]. The accuracy comparison in article use showed that [+SR, −HK] and [−SR, +HK] were the most challenging contexts to acquire.","PeriodicalId":376872,"journal":{"name":"Premise: Journal of English Education","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Premise: Journal of English Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v12i2.7502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study investigates the accuracy order and underlying processes of acquiring English articles by 45 undergraduate Arab EFL learners drawn from three proficiency groups. The theoretical approach adopted here is Bickerton's (1981) semantic model that focuses on the features ±Specific Referent(±SR) and ±Assumed Known to the Hearer (±HK). The study aims to identify what the three measures, SOC (Supplied in Obligatory Contexts), TLU (Target-Like Use), and UOC (Used in Obligatory Contexts), reveal about the accuracy order of the acquisition of English articles in the written and oral production tasks. It also seeks to determine the semantic contexts in which the articles are overgeneralized and the most challenging context to acquire. The results show that the SOC measure reveals an accuracy order of a >the >Ø and the >a >Ø, whereas the TLU measure reveals an accuracy order of the>a>Ø across the groups. In addition, the UOC measure reveals that Ø goes through a flooding-then-trickling process, then experiences a U-shaped behavior highlighted by an overgeneralization stage, and follows the by undergoing a U-shaped development. Furthermore, the learners have difficulty distinguishing [±HK] and [±Countability]. The accuracy comparison in article use showed that [+SR, −HK] and [−SR, +HK] were the most challenging contexts to acquire.
英语冠词系统习得的准确性顺序:来自阿拉伯大学生英语学习者书面和口头产出的证据
本研究调查了45名阿拉伯本科英语学习者习得英语冠词的准确性、顺序和基本过程。本文采用的理论方法是Bickerton(1981)的语义模型,该模型侧重于特征±Specific Referent(±SR)和±assume Known to The Hearer(±HK)。本研究旨在确定三个指标SOC(提供于强制性语境)、TLU(目标样使用)和UOC(使用于强制性语境)对英语冠词在书面和口头生产任务中习得的准确性顺序的揭示。它还试图确定在其中的文章是过度概括的语义语境和最具挑战性的语境获得。结果表明,SOC测度的准确率顺序为a> The >Ø和>a>Ø,而TLU测度的准确率顺序为>a>Ø。此外,UOC测量结果表明,Ø经历了一个先泛滥后涓滴的过程,然后经历了一个u型行为,突出表现为过度泛化阶段,随后经历了一个u型发展。此外,学习者难以区分[±HK]和[±可数性]。冠词使用的准确性比较表明,[+SR,−HK]和[- SR, +HK]是最难获得的语境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信