Poverty, Inequality, National Wealth: Empirical Analysis and Policy Implications

O. Sukharev
{"title":"Poverty, Inequality, National Wealth: Empirical Analysis and Policy Implications","authors":"O. Sukharev","doi":"10.33917/es-4.184.2022.70-81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the study of poverty and inequality in the economic growth of the most developed countries, with a general focus on the formation of social policy consistent with the growth policy. The purpose of the study is to conduct a macroeconomic analysis of poverty, inequality and wealth in the G7 countries, China and Russia, with the ensuing substantiation of a social development strategy for the Russian economy. The methodology is made up of empirical analysis, as well as regression modeling, which make it possible to identify in a comparative way the connectivity of the dynamics of relevant indicators of social development — the level of national poverty and wealth, the Gini coefficient and general inequality, growth rate, human development index. The result of the study is a precisely confirmed empirical relationship between the level of poverty and inequality for the countries considered, that is, a high value of one parameter corresponds to a high value of another. Consequently, poverty reduction may imply a reduction in inequality, and not only relative, but also absolute. In addition, it was found that for developed countries, high levels of poverty and inequality mean low values of the human development index. Social policy aimed at human development requires that its instruments be harmonized, including the necessary alignment with the current macroeconomic policies to stimulate growth. The magnitude of national wealth does not guarantee high growth rates, as well as low levels of inequality and poverty. A high level of inequality can accompany economic growth, having a positive effect on the growth rate, as for the Russian economy. In this regard, the current policy needs a reasonable selection of measures to stimulate growth and, at the same time, measures to reduce inequality, which can and should not be limited only to tax changes that require special confirmation of influence, but to institutional changes that regulate the creation and appropriation of income.","PeriodicalId":155873,"journal":{"name":"Economic Strategies","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Strategies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33917/es-4.184.2022.70-81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of poverty and inequality in the economic growth of the most developed countries, with a general focus on the formation of social policy consistent with the growth policy. The purpose of the study is to conduct a macroeconomic analysis of poverty, inequality and wealth in the G7 countries, China and Russia, with the ensuing substantiation of a social development strategy for the Russian economy. The methodology is made up of empirical analysis, as well as regression modeling, which make it possible to identify in a comparative way the connectivity of the dynamics of relevant indicators of social development — the level of national poverty and wealth, the Gini coefficient and general inequality, growth rate, human development index. The result of the study is a precisely confirmed empirical relationship between the level of poverty and inequality for the countries considered, that is, a high value of one parameter corresponds to a high value of another. Consequently, poverty reduction may imply a reduction in inequality, and not only relative, but also absolute. In addition, it was found that for developed countries, high levels of poverty and inequality mean low values of the human development index. Social policy aimed at human development requires that its instruments be harmonized, including the necessary alignment with the current macroeconomic policies to stimulate growth. The magnitude of national wealth does not guarantee high growth rates, as well as low levels of inequality and poverty. A high level of inequality can accompany economic growth, having a positive effect on the growth rate, as for the Russian economy. In this regard, the current policy needs a reasonable selection of measures to stimulate growth and, at the same time, measures to reduce inequality, which can and should not be limited only to tax changes that require special confirmation of influence, but to institutional changes that regulate the creation and appropriation of income.
贫困、不平等、国家财富:实证分析与政策启示
这篇文章致力于研究最发达国家经济增长中的贫困和不平等问题,重点是与增长政策相一致的社会政策的形成。这项研究的目的是对七国集团国家、中国和俄罗斯的贫困、不平等和财富进行宏观经济分析,随后为俄罗斯经济制定社会发展战略。该方法由经验分析和回归模型组成,从而能够以比较的方式确定社会发展有关指标动态的联系- -国家贫穷和财富水平、基尼系数和一般不平等、增长率、人类发展指数。研究的结果是所考虑的国家的贫困水平和不平等之间的经验关系得到了精确的证实,即一个参数的高值对应于另一个参数的高值。因此,减少贫困可能意味着减少不平等,不仅是相对的,而且是绝对的。此外,研究发现,对于发达国家来说,高度贫穷和不平等意味着人类发展指数的低值。旨在人的发展的社会政策需要协调其手段,包括与当前的宏观经济政策保持必要的一致,以刺激增长。国民财富的规模并不能保证高增长率,以及低水平的不平等和贫困。高度的不平等可以伴随着经济增长,对增长率产生积极影响,就像俄罗斯经济一样。在这方面,目前的政策需要合理选择刺激增长的措施,同时需要采取减少不平等的措施,这些措施可以而且不应仅限于需要特别确认影响的税收改革,而应限于规范收入创造和分配的体制改革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信