‘The grade alone provides no learning’: investigating assessment literacy among Norwegian physical education teachers

Petter E. Leirhaug, A. MacPhail, C. Annerstedt
{"title":"‘The grade alone provides no learning’: investigating assessment literacy among Norwegian physical education teachers","authors":"Petter E. Leirhaug, A. MacPhail, C. Annerstedt","doi":"10.1080/18377122.2016.1145429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper explores the four inter-dependent elements of assessment literacy proposed by Hay and Penney [(2013). Assessment in physical education. A sociocultural perspective. New York: Routledge] – assessment comprehension, assessment application, assessment interpretation and critical engagement with assessment. More specific, the study reported in this paper addresses how Norwegian physical education teachers reflected assessment literacy in descriptions and discussions of their assessment practice. Twenty-three physical education teachers from six upper secondary schools in Norway participated in focus groups. Analysis and discussion are informed by the four elements of assessment literacy. Findings demonstrate a general need to enhance assessment literacy among the teachers, with particular focus on dialogue with students and critical engagement with assessment. Acknowledging assessment literacy as an ongoing process, the study suggests that it may be more effective to consider ‘preconditions’ than ‘elements’ of assessment literacy for a physical education teacher to be considered as acting assessment literate.","PeriodicalId":125416,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18377122.2016.1145429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper explores the four inter-dependent elements of assessment literacy proposed by Hay and Penney [(2013). Assessment in physical education. A sociocultural perspective. New York: Routledge] – assessment comprehension, assessment application, assessment interpretation and critical engagement with assessment. More specific, the study reported in this paper addresses how Norwegian physical education teachers reflected assessment literacy in descriptions and discussions of their assessment practice. Twenty-three physical education teachers from six upper secondary schools in Norway participated in focus groups. Analysis and discussion are informed by the four elements of assessment literacy. Findings demonstrate a general need to enhance assessment literacy among the teachers, with particular focus on dialogue with students and critical engagement with assessment. Acknowledging assessment literacy as an ongoing process, the study suggests that it may be more effective to consider ‘preconditions’ than ‘elements’ of assessment literacy for a physical education teacher to be considered as acting assessment literate.
“单靠成绩是学不到东西的”:调查挪威体育教师的评估素养
本文探讨了Hay和Penney[(2013)]提出的评估素养的四个相互依存的要素。体育教学评价。社会文化视角。[纽约:劳特利奇]-评估理解,评估应用,评估解释和对评估的批判性参与。更具体地说,本文报告的研究解决了挪威体育教师如何在描述和讨论他们的评估实践中反映评估素养。来自挪威六所高中的23名体育教师参加了焦点小组。评估素养的四个要素为分析和讨论提供了依据。调查结果表明,普遍需要提高教师的评估素养,特别注重与学生的对话和对评估的批判性参与。承认评估素养是一个持续的过程,该研究表明,考虑评估素养的“先决条件”可能比考虑评估素养的“要素”更有效,因为体育教师被认为是行为评估素养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信