Conclusion: Contemporary Political Art Cinema

James J. Harvey
{"title":"Conclusion: Contemporary Political Art Cinema","authors":"James J. Harvey","doi":"10.3366/EDINBURGH/9781474423786.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By way of conclusion, I once again bring to the foreground debates on art cinema, in order to answer three questions directly: where precisely do political redistributions exist in the films discussed? How do these redistributions relate specifically to consensus politics? Third, how does the discourse of art cinema itself occupy a particular space of political potential? To answer each question, I revisit key points made in each chapter in order to elaborate on how art cinema proposes confrontations with, and developments from, Rancière’s claim that ‘there is no politics of cinema’.","PeriodicalId":126074,"journal":{"name":"Jacques Rancière and the Politics of Art Cinema","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jacques Rancière and the Politics of Art Cinema","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/EDINBURGH/9781474423786.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By way of conclusion, I once again bring to the foreground debates on art cinema, in order to answer three questions directly: where precisely do political redistributions exist in the films discussed? How do these redistributions relate specifically to consensus politics? Third, how does the discourse of art cinema itself occupy a particular space of political potential? To answer each question, I revisit key points made in each chapter in order to elaborate on how art cinema proposes confrontations with, and developments from, Rancière’s claim that ‘there is no politics of cinema’.
结论:当代政治艺术电影
作为总结,我再次把关于艺术电影的争论放到前台,以便直接回答三个问题:政治再分配在讨论的电影中究竟存在于何处?这些再分配与共识政治有何具体关系?第三,艺术电影本身的话语如何占据特定的政治潜力空间?为了回答每个问题,我回顾了每一章中的关键点,以详细阐述艺术电影是如何提出对抗的,并从ranci的主张“电影没有政治”中发展出来的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信