Causality and Functional Safety - How Causal Models Relate to the Automotive Standards ISO 26262, ISO/PAS 21448, and UL 4600

R. Maier, J. Mottok
{"title":"Causality and Functional Safety - How Causal Models Relate to the Automotive Standards ISO 26262, ISO/PAS 21448, and UL 4600","authors":"R. Maier, J. Mottok","doi":"10.1109/AE54730.2022.9920053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With autonomous driving, the system complexity of vehicles will increase drastically. This requires new approaches to ensure system safety. Looking at standards like ISO 26262 or ISO/PAS 21448 and their suggested methodologies, an increasing trend in the recent literature can be noticed to incorporate uncertainty. Often this is done by using Bayesian Networks as a framework to enable probabilistic reasoning. These models can also be used to represent causal relationships. Many publications claim to model cause-effect relations, yet rarely give a formal introduction of the implications and resulting possibilities such an approach may have. This paper aims to link the domains of causal reasoning and automotive system safety by investigating relations between causal models and approaches like FMEA, FTA, or GSN. First, the famous “Ladder of Causation” and its implications on causality are reviewed. Next, we give an informal overview of common hazard and reliability analysis techniques and associate them with probabilistic models. Finally, we analyse a mixed-model methodology called Hybrid Causal Logic, extend its idea, and build the concept of a causal shell model of automotive system safety.","PeriodicalId":113076,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Conference on Applied Electronics (AE)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Conference on Applied Electronics (AE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AE54730.2022.9920053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

With autonomous driving, the system complexity of vehicles will increase drastically. This requires new approaches to ensure system safety. Looking at standards like ISO 26262 or ISO/PAS 21448 and their suggested methodologies, an increasing trend in the recent literature can be noticed to incorporate uncertainty. Often this is done by using Bayesian Networks as a framework to enable probabilistic reasoning. These models can also be used to represent causal relationships. Many publications claim to model cause-effect relations, yet rarely give a formal introduction of the implications and resulting possibilities such an approach may have. This paper aims to link the domains of causal reasoning and automotive system safety by investigating relations between causal models and approaches like FMEA, FTA, or GSN. First, the famous “Ladder of Causation” and its implications on causality are reviewed. Next, we give an informal overview of common hazard and reliability analysis techniques and associate them with probabilistic models. Finally, we analyse a mixed-model methodology called Hybrid Causal Logic, extend its idea, and build the concept of a causal shell model of automotive system safety.
因果关系和功能安全-因果模型如何与汽车标准ISO 26262, ISO/PAS 21448和UL 4600相关
随着自动驾驶的发展,车辆的系统复杂性将急剧增加。这需要新的方法来确保系统安全。看看ISO 26262或ISO/PAS 21448等标准及其建议的方法,可以注意到最近文献中越来越多的趋势包含不确定性。这通常是通过使用贝叶斯网络作为框架来实现概率推理来实现的。这些模型也可以用来表示因果关系。许多出版物声称建立了因果关系模型,但很少正式介绍这种方法可能产生的影响和结果可能性。本文旨在通过调查因果模型与FMEA、FTA或GSN等方法之间的关系,将因果推理和汽车系统安全领域联系起来。首先,回顾了著名的“因果阶梯”及其对因果关系的启示。接下来,我们对常见的危害和可靠性分析技术进行非正式概述,并将它们与概率模型联系起来。最后,我们分析了一种称为混合因果逻辑的混合模型方法,扩展了其思想,并建立了汽车系统安全因果壳模型的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信