Combining human knowledge and operational data to promote detailed and effective reporting

Jennifer Danczyk, Paula Jacobs, Stephanie Kane, Michael Farry, W. Thornton
{"title":"Combining human knowledge and operational data to promote detailed and effective reporting","authors":"Jennifer Danczyk, Paula Jacobs, Stephanie Kane, Michael Farry, W. Thornton","doi":"10.1109/COGSIMA.2015.7108201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are many task-related factors that drive the complexity and diversity of submarine operations during a mission, including knowing the correct time to make periscope observations, estimating the correct sea state, and being aware of the proximity of contacts. In addition, there are unpredictable events and circumstances, including equipment failures, environmental factors, and adversary actions, that affect the operation's success or failure. After operations are complete, commanders are tasked with recounting and reporting events of interest. Commanders are asked to recall details of critical incidents, when their perceptual and cognitive resources are likely to be over-tasked, resulting in less accurate recall. In most operations, there is little objective data collection to back up those recollections, especially for critical incidents that had the potential to cause catastrophes but did not. However, instances where catastrophes are narrowly avoided offer valuable teaching moments for crewmembers. Collecting and visualizing objective performance data within a mission reconstruction tool can help commanders account for actual actions and decisions for the purpose of reporting, and also enables resilient planning and optimal execution of future tasks, because commanders are able to analyze alternative courses of action (COAs) and their trade-offs. Most importantly, having a more comprehensive analysis tool can enable more accurate and thorough training, thus improving the mission performance and operational safety of future submarine operations and performance.","PeriodicalId":373467,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COGSIMA.2015.7108201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There are many task-related factors that drive the complexity and diversity of submarine operations during a mission, including knowing the correct time to make periscope observations, estimating the correct sea state, and being aware of the proximity of contacts. In addition, there are unpredictable events and circumstances, including equipment failures, environmental factors, and adversary actions, that affect the operation's success or failure. After operations are complete, commanders are tasked with recounting and reporting events of interest. Commanders are asked to recall details of critical incidents, when their perceptual and cognitive resources are likely to be over-tasked, resulting in less accurate recall. In most operations, there is little objective data collection to back up those recollections, especially for critical incidents that had the potential to cause catastrophes but did not. However, instances where catastrophes are narrowly avoided offer valuable teaching moments for crewmembers. Collecting and visualizing objective performance data within a mission reconstruction tool can help commanders account for actual actions and decisions for the purpose of reporting, and also enables resilient planning and optimal execution of future tasks, because commanders are able to analyze alternative courses of action (COAs) and their trade-offs. Most importantly, having a more comprehensive analysis tool can enable more accurate and thorough training, thus improving the mission performance and operational safety of future submarine operations and performance.
结合人力知识和业务数据,促进详细有效的报告
在执行任务期间,有许多与任务相关的因素驱动着潜艇操作的复杂性和多样性,包括知道进行潜望镜观察的正确时间,估计正确的海况,以及意识到接触点的接近程度。此外,还存在不可预测的事件和情况,包括设备故障、环境因素和对手行为,这些都会影响操作的成败。行动完成后,指挥官的任务是重述和报告感兴趣的事件。指挥官被要求回忆关键事件的细节,这时他们的感知和认知资源可能会超负荷,导致回忆的准确性降低。在大多数操作中,很少有客观的数据收集来支持这些回忆,特别是对于有可能造成灾难但没有造成灾难的关键事件。然而,侥幸避免灾难的例子为机组人员提供了宝贵的教训。在任务重建工具中收集和可视化客观性能数据可以帮助指挥官为报告目的考虑实际行动和决策,并且还可以实现弹性规划和未来任务的最佳执行,因为指挥官能够分析替代行动方案(coa)及其权衡。最重要的是,拥有更全面的分析工具,可以实现更准确、更彻底的训练,从而提高未来潜艇作战性能的任务性能和操作安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信