Collective Annotation: Perspectives for Information Retrieval Improvement

G. Cabanac, M. Chevalier, C. Chrisment, C. Julien
{"title":"Collective Annotation: Perspectives for Information Retrieval Improvement","authors":"G. Cabanac, M. Chevalier, C. Chrisment, C. Julien","doi":"10.5555/1931390.1931440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays we enter the Web 2.0 era where people's participation is a key principle. In this context, collective annotations enable to share and discuss readers' feedback with regard to digital documents. The results of this activity are going to be used in the Information Retrieval context, which already tends to harness similar collective contributions. In this paper, we propose a collective annotation model supporting feedback exchange through discussion threads. Considering this model, we associate annotations with a measure of the sparked consensus degree (social validation), this allows to provide a synthesized view of associated discussions. Finally, we investigate how Information Retrieval systems may benefit from the proposed model, thus taking advantage of human-contributed highly value-added information, namely collective annotations.","PeriodicalId":120472,"journal":{"name":"RIAO Conference","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RIAO Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5555/1931390.1931440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Nowadays we enter the Web 2.0 era where people's participation is a key principle. In this context, collective annotations enable to share and discuss readers' feedback with regard to digital documents. The results of this activity are going to be used in the Information Retrieval context, which already tends to harness similar collective contributions. In this paper, we propose a collective annotation model supporting feedback exchange through discussion threads. Considering this model, we associate annotations with a measure of the sparked consensus degree (social validation), this allows to provide a synthesized view of associated discussions. Finally, we investigate how Information Retrieval systems may benefit from the proposed model, thus taking advantage of human-contributed highly value-added information, namely collective annotations.
集体标注:信息检索改进的视角
如今,我们进入了Web 2.0时代,人们的参与是一个关键原则。在这种情况下,集体注释可以共享和讨论读者对数字文档的反馈。这一活动的结果将用于信息检索上下文中,它已经倾向于利用类似的集体贡献。在本文中,我们提出了一个支持通过讨论线程进行反馈交换的集体注释模型。考虑到这个模型,我们将注释与引发的共识程度(社会验证)的度量相关联,这允许提供相关讨论的综合视图。最后,我们研究了信息检索系统如何从所提出的模型中受益,从而利用人类贡献的高附加值信息,即集体注释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信